My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-05-28_REVISION - C1981035
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2020-05-28_REVISION - C1981035
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2020 6:47:00 AM
Creation date
5/29/2020 6:43:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/28/2020
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
DRMS
To
GCC Energy, LLC
Type & Sequence
TR29
Email Name
JHB
THM
RDZ
ZTT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tom Bird C1981035 TR29 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />April 8, 2020 <br />GCC's May 13, 2020 response: Please consider the following responses: 1. GCC the <br />revised SEDCAD model easier to understand. The SWS flows and corresponding <br />structures networks, are easier to follow when model separately (using utility runs to <br />combine). "Safety as a Value" 2. Combining everything into one model would result in a <br />large model with a complex structure network that would produce an output of equal <br />complexity. 3. GCC wanted to preserve the current hydrology report as much as possible <br />and only redesign/replace the drainage reports affected by TR -29. <br />11) Maps: There are two labels for C21 on Map King II -007A. One points to a culvert under the <br />Basin Ramp, and the other points to a ditch west of the large topsoil pile. Please explain and <br />revise the submittal, as necessary. Note that the Culvert Capacities table lists the length of <br />C21 as 40 feet. Also, do the font colors (red for one C21 label and black for the other) have <br />significance? <br />GCC Energy's 05/08/2020 response; The red C21 label west of the large topsoil pile has <br />been omitted from Map King II -007A. <br />The following comments pertain to Section 4.03.2 — Access Roads <br />4.03.2(l) — General Requirements <br />All information required by this section of the Rule has been provided. Please refer to Sections <br />2.05.3 of King's PAP and proposed page Section 2.04.6, page 8. While all general requirements <br />have been met, it was observed that Section 2.05.3 of King's PAP needs to be updated to include <br />discussions regarding the new access road. <br />12) Please update Section 2.05.3 to include discussion of the new access road to King III portals. <br />The operator has updated section 2.05.3 to include discussion of the new access road to the <br />King III portals. This response is acceptable and no additional information is needed for this <br />item. <br />4.03.2(31— Design and Construction <br />4.03.2(3)(e)(viii) — Per this Rule, "Embankment slopes shall not be steeper than 1.5h: lv, except <br />that if the embankment material is minimum of 85 percent rock, slopes shall not be steeper than <br />1.35H:1v if it has been demonstrated to the Division that embankment stability will result." As <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.