My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-05-26_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981028
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2020-05-26_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2021 11:16:47 AM
Creation date
5/26/2020 12:48:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/26/2020
Doc Name Note
Findings & Cost Estimate SL10
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Coors Energy Company
Type & Sequence
SL10
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
JHB
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
season graminids; Indian ricegrass, Crested wheatgrass, Thickspike wheatgrass, Slender wheatgrass, <br />Bluebunch wheatgrass, and a rush species (Juncus sp.). Of these 6 species, no one species exceeded <br />greater than 3% allowable relative cover, however, the sum of these cool season species accounted <br />for 4.5% allowable relative cover. Ten warm season species were encountered during sampling of <br />the Area 33 parcel. Four warm season grasses contributed greater than 3% allowable relative cover, <br />and only one, Prairie sandreed, contributed greater than 40% allowable relative cover. Prairie <br />sandreed tends to grow as a robust wide leaved grass. It is logical that encountering a Prairie <br />sandreed plant during vegetation sampling would result in a higher vegetative cover value than <br />sampling other species that tend to be low growing, smaller plants with narrower leaves. The good <br />representation of the other graminid species indicates that this reclaimed community is not <br />excessively dominated by a single species. <br />As stated before, species composition is not a requirement for Phase II bond release success. The <br />Division analyses the data to determine if the reclaimed communities are approaching the required <br />success standards prior to final bond release. The data presented for Area 31, 32, and 33 parcels <br />indicate that the reclaimed communities have not yet achieved the species composition standards but <br />area approaching the success standards. <br />The approved post mining land use is rangeland. The established species are appropriate and support <br />the post mining land use. Observation of Pronghorn antelope browsing in the reclaimed parcels <br />during the bond release inspection provides additional evidence that the established vegetation is also <br />beneficial to wildlife. There is no woody stem success requirement on the Keenesburg reclaimed <br />area, and noxious weed species were minimal with no obvious signs of infestations. The surrounding <br />area is prone to Cheatgrass infestation. CEC has implemented numerous different efforts to manage <br />Cheatgrass in the reclaimed areas in accordance with their approved weed control plan. <br />CEC used the Revised /Universal soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) to demonstrate acceptable soil loss on the <br />reclaimed lands. The Division has previously approved CEC's use ofthis model to demonstrate acceptable <br />sediment solid demonstration. CEC used a 2 -year, 6 -hour Type II storm event to calculate the R factor in <br />the RUSLE equation. The 2 -year, 6 -hour Type II event for the mine area was 1.4 inches of rainfall. The <br />Division finds the use of this factor acceptable. CEC provided a figure showing how slope length and <br />gradient were determined. The cover factor was derived from 2018 cover and species measurements. <br />CEC's calculations determined that undisturbed area would contribute 0.061 tons /acre/year of sediment. <br />The reclaimed parcels were calculated to potentially contribute 0.043 tons/acre/year of sediment using the <br />same assumptions. The Division considers that demonstration acceptable and shows that the reclaimed <br />areas are projected to contribute less sediment than the undisturbed condition. The results of CEC's <br />calculations are found in Table 3 in the SL10 application. <br />Summary and Conclusions <br />Based upon a review of the mine permit, the applicant's bond release application, and site inspections, the <br />Division finds that Coors Energy Company has replaced topsoil in accordance with the approved <br />reclamation plan. Coors Energy Company has established vegetation which supports the approved post <br />mine land use and meets the approved success standard for vegetative cover. The Division finds that the <br />Keenesburg Mine C1981-028 SL -10 Page 7 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.