My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-05-13_REVISION - C1981010 (41)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2020-05-13_REVISION - C1981010 (41)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2025 6:23:01 AM
Creation date
5/15/2020 6:48:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/13/2020
Doc Name Note
Proposed Adequacy Review No. 4
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Trapper Mining Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR9
Email Name
JLE
RAR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1.4 DETERMINATION OF BOND <br /> Trapper Mining Inc. presently maintains a reclamation performance bond for the Trapper <br /> Mine payable to the State of Colorado and the United States Office of Surface Mining <br /> Reclamation and Enforcement. Upon approval of this permit application, a performance <br /> bond or equivalent, acceptable surety will be secured in an amount equal to the estimated <br /> costs for returning the affected area to a satisfactory condition as defined by applicable <br /> regulations and this permit application. <br /> The equipment productivity estimates used in regrade time calculations were derived from <br /> the Caterpillar Performance Handbook, edition 47. Topsoil fleet hours were derived <br /> using TALPAC haulage simulation software. DRMS database ownership and operating <br /> costs were used where available; otherwise, these costs were extracted from Trapper <br /> Mining Inc. historical data and information obtained from Wagner Equipment Rentals. <br /> All reclamation costs were calculated according to the worst-case condition of reclamation <br /> requirements. The costs that were calculated in this manner realistically represent those the <br /> Division could incur at any time during the permit period, and not just for the conditions that <br /> may exist at the end of the five years. Appendix A Tables A-1 through A-14 summarize <br /> regrade, topsoil replacement, revegetation areas & costs, demolition, and miscellaneous <br /> costs associated with mine closure. The driving factor in determining the worst case year <br /> was the extent to which Nighthawk (N)-pit has been opened. This is a truck/Excavator, <br /> dozer, and dragline pit. <br /> During the proposed worst case year, which is estimated to be 2022, the depth and resulting <br /> volume of material required to backfill both N and L pits is at its maximum, with respect to <br /> the permit term. The projected volume of overburden replacement, which includes the <br /> dragline, dozer stripping, and truck/Excavator operations, is greatest in the year 2022 (see <br /> Table 1.4-2). <br /> The primary contributing factor to the increase in the projected Performance Bond for the <br /> worst case bond year of 2022 is the development of N Pit. This pit will be opened in 2020 <br /> with topsoil stripping operations and development of the initial boxcut at the west end of the <br /> pit(see "Trapper Worst Case Bond Year" narrative for a description of mining operations for <br /> the permit term). By 2022, N pit will have advanced to the point that the entire box-cut is <br /> open, with some additional pre-strip open, thus resulting in a substantial area of pit being <br /> open. In addition, highwall mining in the initial boxcut is in progress, which requires the delay <br /> of reclamation activities in this pit during this process. <br /> The Ash Pit is anticipated to still be receiving ash from Craig Station. There will be some <br /> reclamation done in the ash pit by 2022, but a significant portion of the pit will remain open <br /> beyond the permit term. Derringer/Enfield Pit, previously anticipated to receive ash, will be <br /> reclaimed in 2021 and 2022 and will not be included as part of the bond closure costs given <br /> in Table 1.4-1. <br /> As L pit advances eastward, the cuts tie into the cuts of the former East A (AE) pit. AE pit <br /> will be incorporated into L pit and will, therefore, no longer be referred to as a separate pit. <br /> Due to the pre-stripping operations with the Truck/Excavator fleet, combined with the dozer <br /> stripping and dragline operations, L pit's overall length and width, with respect to the five <br /> year permit term, is greatest in 2022 (see Table 1.4-2 and "Trapper Worst Case Bond Year' <br /> narrative for a description of mining operations for the permit term). <br /> revision- P2-Cri <br /> 1-31 <br /> Approved: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.