Laserfiche WebLink
RULE 2 PERMITS <br /> `' •F,' cwax`..Y.Ti.'rysR4..+Y+6.�M5` <br /> 41.%s.r`:e+S UA...-✓.c'ry ,NN:sainT3A"»aM c+:§:'.b+ 1¢+'+➢.40:r. t4¢'.Ymg�`u$...o\^�o..A.flF# 416,44,11, '.N W.V...+'4004A,attkq'm.:. <br /> elk. A majority of the browse species (serviceberry, oak, snowberry, bitterbrush, sage, <br /> chokecherry) showed overutilization to varying degrees. (It has been evident both past and present <br /> that many of the shrubs are in a decadent condition.) <br /> The results of past poor range management practices and heavy browse use have been a reduction <br /> in growth with less available forage. In addition, species such as oak and serviceberry have grown <br /> taller, with palatable growth being limited to a height which can be reached only by the largest <br /> animals. <br /> As oak and serviceberry have grown taller, large windbreaks have been created. In the winter, <br /> these areas hold the snow, which becomes deep enough to limit all access by deer and elk. Thirty <br /> years of observations on the permit area have shown that winter use of the mountain shrub type by <br /> elk and deer is highly dependent on snow depth and severity of winter weather conditions. The <br /> use of serviceberry has been limited to shrubs near the edges of the stands where less snow buildup <br /> occurs. Depending on snow depth, elk and deer populations tend to concentrate on south facing <br /> hill slope areas where snow depth is minimal. <br /> Colowyo began fencing the boundaries of the Federal lease during the fall of 1976. The fencing <br /> was completed during the summer of 1977. At this time all cattle were removed from the lease <br /> area. The fencing was completed as part of an overall grazing management program to improve <br /> the rangeland after several years of over-grazing. In 1991, Colowyo constructed a similar fence <br /> to provide a boundary for the areas added to the Permit and to exclude grazing in this area. <br /> Disturbed Areas <br /> Disturbed acreage has been kept to a minimum in the permit area by proper planning for the <br /> location of mine support facilities, haul roads, and pit advance. The mining methods, as discussed <br /> in Section 2.05.3, allow for a minimum amount of disturbance on an annual basis (less than 100 <br /> acres per pit), when compared to strictly one or two seam mines with similar production levels <br /> which disturb several hundred acres annually per pit. Topsoil and vegetation are removed during <br /> the summer and fall months to allow for only enough disturbance to facilitate mining advance <br /> through June of the following year. <br /> Habitat Improvement Program <br /> Prior to start-up of mining, Colowyo initiated a big game habitat improvement program in January <br /> 1976. The purpose of this on-going program was to increase range carrying capacity by increasing <br /> available browse and increased access to herbaceous species. Another objective of the program <br /> was to provide increased forage on selected undisturbed areas on and adjacent to the mine site to <br /> draw wildlife away from newly reclaimed areas until the vegetation became established. A third <br /> benefit was to improve enough habitat prior to and during mining in order to offset the temporary <br /> loss of habitat from mining. <br /> The technique for habitat improvement involved using a rubber tired or tracked dozer during the <br /> winter months,preferably when there was minimal snow cover and the ground was frozen,to shear <br /> off the dormant shrubs a few inches above ground level. <br /> Rule 2 Permits 2.05-43 Revision Date: 12/20/19 <br /> Revision No.: TR-135 <br />