Laserfiche WebLink
RULE 2 PERMITS <br /> Colowyo initiated range management and habitat improvement programs, and other mitigation <br /> measures in 1976 to offset the expected impacts of mining. A detailed discussion of the wildlife <br /> mitigation plans is set forth in Section 2.05.6. <br /> Aerial Counts (See CDM report for update information) <br /> Initial aerial transects were flown monthly throughout the winters of 1974-1975 and 1975-1976, <br /> and one flight in 1977 to count elk and deer as well as coyotes, bobcats, raptors, etc. The counts <br /> were made to establish population trends, activity patterns, and estimate numbers of animals <br /> wintering on the site. As shown on the Big Game Use Information Map (Map 13), the study site <br /> was gridded into five areas to allow for more detailed observations. The areas were flown on an <br /> east-west pattern. Flight lines were normally about one-half mile apart, which allowed <br /> observations to be made a quarter of a mile on either side of the aircraft. All observations were <br /> recorded on standard forms and included numbers of animals location, habitat type, and when <br /> possible sex and age. <br /> During the two winters of observations (1974-1975 and 1975-1976), deer and elk numbers <br /> fluctuated from 43 to 101 and from 20 to 119, respectively. Conclusions that can be drawn from <br /> the data are as follows: (1) the number of animals observed is greatly affected by counting <br /> conditions; (2) the severity of winter affect the total number of animals observed within the area; <br /> (3) certain areas are utilized more than others; and (4) deep snows have a greater impact on deer <br /> numbers and areas of use than on elk. <br /> As discussed earlier in this section, use of the winter range by deer and elk is directly related to <br /> weather conditions and snow depth. <br /> Information from the aerial surveys are shown in Table 2.04.11-6, Aerial Game Counts. <br /> Calving and Fawning Areas <br /> Counts were made each spring in late May and early June(peak of calving and fawning activities) <br /> of 1974 and 1975 and again in 1980. The study site was traversed by vehicle and on foot to identify <br /> the more desirable areas as shown by the number of females with young. The counts were made <br /> early in the morning or late evening. Binoculars or a spotting scope are used to observe the animals <br /> at considerable distance. This technique helps to minimize undesirable or unnecessary flushing of <br /> the animals. By not driving the animals into the heavy cover, more accurate counts can be made. <br /> By establishing a baseline for numbers of calves and fawns born each spring,average reproductive <br /> rates,and identification of desirable calving and fawning locations,potential or actual impacts can <br /> be evaluated. Appropriate mitigation measures (as discussed in Section 2.05.6) have been <br /> implemented. <br /> The deer and elk observations are summarized in Table 2.04.11-7, Sex and Age Ratios. <br /> Rule 2 Permits 2.04-62 Revision Date: 12/20/19 <br /> Revision No.: TR-135 <br />