My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-03-24_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2020-03-24_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2020 6:34:06 PM
Creation date
5/11/2020 3:31:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/24/2020
Type & Sequence
TR135
Section_Exhibit Name
2.04 Information on Environmental Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br /> When using the limiting tractive force concept, a channel with adequate capacity will not erode if <br /> its average shear stress (given by the equation, shear stress is equal to the unit weight of the fluid <br /> times the hydraulic radius of the channel times the slope of the channel in ft/ft) is equal to or less <br /> than the permissible tractive force for any given material. It is estimated this maximum allowable <br /> tractive force is approximately 0.7 lbs. per square foot at the Colowyo Mine site. <br /> It can be seen that the allowable velocities and tractive forces for erodible channels are quite small, <br /> thus requiring very wide shallow channels for the slopes at the Colowyo Mine.This type of channel <br /> would appear unnatural and becomes unacceptable as rill erosion and gullying would develop in <br /> the channel bottoms during the low flows associated with precipitation events less than the given <br /> design storm. On the other hand, if the channel is protected from erosion, the allowable velocities <br /> can be increased resulting in a deeper, narrower and more natural looking channel. An effective <br /> and permanent form of protection is rock riprap lining of channels in those sections with excessive <br /> velocities or tractive forces. <br /> An examination of the premining and postmining stream profiles show that the stream gradients, <br /> while at somewhat different elevations,are very similar(see Map 33).The original stream channels <br /> in steep slopes had scatterings of rock, boulders and debris. Frequently these channels were into <br /> bedrock, providing a stable channel. It should be kept in mind that the original streams had <br /> developed over centuries to reach this state of dynamic equilibrium. The mining operation <br /> necessarily removes the bedrock in its natural state, and it is replaced in an unconsolidated <br /> condition. While it is impossible for the mining and reclamation operation to reconstruct the <br /> stabilizing affects of these drainages in bedrock, it is possible and desirable to recreate the <br /> stabilizing affects of the rock protection. This method has been elected to armor and stabilize the <br /> permanent stream channels constructed or to be constructed at the Colowyo Mine site. A summary <br /> of these channels is presented below,and the location of the areas to receive rock riprap protection <br /> are shown on Map 12- Hydrology, South. <br /> Length of Drainage Channels — Feet <br /> Destination Unprotected Rock Protected Total <br /> Southwest Tributary to Streeter 0 3,200 3,200 <br /> South East Tributary to <br /> Streeter 2,500 4,000 6,500 <br /> Streeter Gulch 5,700 13,000 18,700 <br /> Section 11 Ditch 0 1,000 1,000 <br /> Prospect 1,400 2,200 3,600 <br /> Final East Pit 1,200 4,600 5,800 <br /> Section 16 Fill 0 900 900 <br /> South Connection 0 1,200 1,200 <br /> West Pit 2,700 14,300 17,000 <br /> _ Taylor Tributary 2.500 11.500 14,000 <br /> Rule 2 Permits 2.04-39 Revision Date: 12/20/19 <br /> Revision No.: TR-135 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.