My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-03-24_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2020-03-24_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2020 6:34:06 PM
Creation date
5/11/2020 3:31:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/24/2020
Type & Sequence
TR135
Section_Exhibit Name
2.04 Information on Environmental Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br /> The area in the process of being mined and the areas being reclaimed will have increases in runoff <br /> as bare soils tend to have lower infiltration rates than soils protected by a vegetative cover. On <br /> bare soils, the impacting raindrops tend to puddle the soil. The energy of the falling rain breaks <br /> down soil aggregate, and small particles are carried into the soil pores. The net result is a lowering <br /> of the infiltration rate and an increase in runoff. This increased runoff from areas in the process of <br /> being mined and from areas being reclaimed is compensatory. Runoff from the areas being mined <br /> flow to the bottom of the pit which has no outlet. It then evaporates, infiltrates or is otherwise lost <br /> to the surface drainage system.Increased runoff from areas in the process of being reclaimed flows <br /> through constructed channels to a detention pond and eventually enters the natural drainage <br /> system. It is estimated that the combined total area that is in these conditions at any one time will <br /> be not more than 1000 acres. The net effects of the lost runoff and the increased runoff on the <br /> hydrologic balance are considered compensating or negligible and involves a small portion of the <br /> total area being mined. <br /> It is also considered that infiltration into the subsurface soils will not appreciably change. Deep <br /> percolation into the subsurface soil cannot occur until the potential evapotranspiration demand for <br /> the vegetative cover has been met and the normal root zone of the plant is saturated. The Colowyo <br /> Mine is situated in a semi-arid region where this potential evapotranspiration is almost always <br /> greater than the available moisture held by the soil. The net result is water rarely, if ever, is given <br /> the opportunity to percolate into the subsurface material. <br /> The major abstraction from precipitation, evapotranspiration will be affected by mining because <br /> the infiltration rate and moisture-holding capacity of surface soils will change. It is believed the <br /> infiltration rate and moisture-holding capacity will temporarily increase due to the stripping,stock- <br /> piling,handling and spreading of surface soils. This is a temporary condition;and over an extended <br /> period of time, these surface soils will consolidate to approximate premining condition. <br /> Nevertheless, the short-term effects of mining will be an increase in the infiltration rate and <br /> moisture-holding capacity of the surface soils. This will result in an increase in evapotranspiration <br /> and a net decrease in surface runoff. <br /> The process of infiltration of water into soils and water movement within surface soils is an <br /> exceedingly complex process. In general, the infiltration rate is dependent on soil physical <br /> properties, vegetative cover, antecedent soil-water conditions rainfall intensity, and the slope of <br /> the infiltrating surface. The EMRIA Report Number 3-1975 indicates the permeability for surface <br /> soils before mining were slow to moderately slow, 0.20 to 0.60 inch per hour. Moisture retention <br /> or water-holding capacity for these soils was rated good, ranging between four and six inches per <br /> effective soil depth. In studying the infiltration rate of reclaimed lands at Colowyo, Striffler and <br /> Rhodes (1981) calculated a mean final infiltration capacity of 5.5 cm per hour at the Colowyo <br /> Mine site (2.17 inches per hour). The National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, by <br /> the Soil Conservation Service outlines several methods for studying the hydrology of water sheds <br /> and for solving special hydrologic problems that arise in planning and evaluating small to moderate <br /> sized watersheds. One method outlined in this handbook utilizes curve numbers for various soil <br /> types and vegetative covers and presents the relationships: <br /> Rule 2 Permits 2.04-32 Revision Date: 12/20/19 <br /> Revision No.: TR-135 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.