My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-03-24_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2020-03-24_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2020 5:24:59 PM
Creation date
5/9/2020 2:50:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/24/2020
Type & Sequence
TR135
Section_Exhibit Name
Rule 2 Permits -ST
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />To project the potential impact to Good Spring Creek, a weighted TDS loading between the historic low <br />flow at NUGSC (0.85 cfs and 1,050 mg/L TDS) (Table 2.04.7-34) and the projected spoils (0.06 cfs and <br />3,400 mg/L (worst case) and 1,796 mg/L (likely case) TDS; Table 2.04.7-31) was performed. <br />Worst case (pit spoil aquifer TDS concentrations): <br />((0.85 cfs x 1050 mg/L) + (0.06 cfs x 3400 mg/L))/0.92 cfs = 1192 mg/L <br />Reasonable case (groundwater immediately downgradient from pit spoil): <br />((0.85 cfs x 1050 mg/L) + (0.06 cfs x 1796 mg/L))/0.92 cfs = 1087 mg/L <br />Thus, the base flow of Upper Good Spring Creek is calculated to have between 37 and 142 mg/L increase <br />in total dissolved solids, or an increase of between 3.5% and 13.5% caused by the projected contribution <br />from the pit springs. The increase in TDS in the base flow at Lower Good Spring Creek (with the base <br />flow of 1.8 cfs and TDS of 1187 mg/1 placed into the above calculations) would be between 20 mg/L and <br />71 mg/L, or between 1.6% and 6% of TDS increase. Peak flow TDS increases would be less than these <br />values. <br />Based upon analyses performed by Williams and Clark (1994) at the Seneca II Mine, the dominant anion <br />would most likely be sulfate and that the oxidation of the pyrite would be the main source of TDS in the <br />spoil pit water. Oxidation of minor pyrite in the spoil could produce soluble sulfate at the South Taylor <br />pit, which will be the dominant ion causing the increased TDS. The duration of the elevated TDS can be <br />predicted based upon the oxidation of pyrite in the reclaimed spoils pit aquifer. <br />Saturation indices (SI) were calculated for the average constituent concentrations in well 84 -0 -OB <br />(Williams Fork Formation well) and the Streeter Well. The SI is used to determine if a mineral will <br />dissolve into or precipitate from solution. A negative SI indicates that the water is undersaturated with <br />respect to the mineral and, if present, the mineral should dissolve. If the SI is positive, the water is <br />supersaturated with respect to the mineral, and the mineral should precipitate from solution. An SI near <br />zero indicates a condition near equilibrium. Table 2.05.6-3 presents the SI for the wells at Colowyo <br />Mine. <br />The SIs presented in this table are very similar to those determined by Williams and Clark (1994). <br />Calcite and dolomite have positive saturations indices in the sampled wells; therefore, the water is <br />saturated with respect to these minerals and it is not anticipated that an increase in TDS would occur. <br />Sulfate minerals (gypsum and epsomite) have negative SIs; therefore, the water is not saturated with <br />respect to these minerals and increases in TDS would occur if sulfate minerals were present in the spoil. <br />This is consistent with the increase in sulfate in the Streeter Well (1,960 mg/L) as compared to Good <br />Spring Creek (average of 600 mg/L). <br />The average pyritic sulfur concentration in the spoils is 0.09 percent in borehole 97-15, the only borehole <br />in South Taylor with every interval analyzed for pyritic sulfur. The pyritic sulfur concentrations in <br />boreholes 83-133-07, -10, -12, and -14 were measured at only selected intervals biased towards high <br />pyrite; the arithmetic mean of these samples is 0.45% pyritic sulfur. Based upon the exhaustion time for <br />0.20 percent pyrite of 300 years (Williams and Clark 1994), the time of the elevated TDS discharge <br />would be between 150 and 600 years. The actual duration would be reduced in direct proportion to the <br />amount of "piping" that occurs as a result of channel formation within the spoils. This type of flow is <br />documented at other mines, and has reduced the amount of pyrite oxidized in the spoil. Prediction of the <br />amount of piping that will occur is not possible, but assuming that 25 percent of the spoil pile would be <br />bypassed by piping, then the duration of elevated TDS concentrations would be reduced by 25 percent to <br />110 to 450 years. <br />South Taylor/Lower Wilson — Rule 2, Page 85 Revision Date: 4/7/17 <br />Revision No.: RN -07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.