Laserfiche WebLink
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />and the porosity of the materials within the pit. Published infiltration rates for the area are 0.5 inches per <br />year (Rice, 1979) and 3 inches per year (Williams & Clark, 1992), for an average value of 1.8 inches per <br />year. Calculated inflows, in the above equations, indicate an inflow rate 92 gpm (approximately 150 <br />acre-feet/year from 1.8 inches infiltration over 1,000 acres) from infiltration due to precipitation. (No <br />other water is expected to flow into the reclaimed pit materials since the South Taylor Pit is on a <br />topographic and structural high). The volume of water needed to fill the reclaimed pit divided by the <br />infiltration rate equals the time to fill the pit to form an aquifer necessary for sufficient outflow. The <br />result of this calculation is approximately 45 years for pit resaturation to the elevation of the lowest point <br />of the pit boundary where water could be discharged. This assumes no water infiltrates into the <br />undisturbed Williams Fork Formation on the limits of the reclaimed pit, and the entire pit fill becomes <br />saturated. It is possible that the pit fill will be anisotropic and heterogeneous in a way that can allow a pit <br />spring to form prior to complete saturation of the pit fill. It is also possible that most or all of the pit <br />water will enter the Williams Fork Formation (see discussion below) thereby reducing the time to reach <br />saturation or preventing the full thickness from becoming saturated. <br />Groundwater from the reclaimed South Taylor pit will eventually discharge into Good Spring Creek at the <br />drainage that is above the Sturgeon Flume (the unnamed tributary to West Fork Good Spring Creek in <br />Section 21). This would result in a pit spoil spring and/or discharge through colluvial and shallow <br />bedrock groundwater infiltration. This water would likely have the same characteristics as the water in <br />the Streeter Fill well or the Streeter pond or in similar spoil springs (Williams and Clark, 1994). <br />Analytical data for these sampling points are summarized on Table 2.04.7-31. <br />If all of the water that infiltrates into the pit discharges into Good Spring Creek, then 150 acre-feet per <br />year or 92 gallons per minute (0.21 cfs) of pit spoil water will enter the Good Spring Creek drainage. <br />This is more flow than originates from the potentially -impacted springs, which have an average annual <br />flow of 77 gpm. <br />The alluvial aquifer associated with Good Spring Creek has a high transmissivity and is unconfined. <br />Possible impacts to this aquifer would be associated with the infiltration of water from the pit and water <br />quality deviations caused by infiltration of runoff water. <br />The preferential flowpath of bedrock groundwater from the reclaimed pits would tend to be down -dip <br />through and between the different strata of the Williams Fork Formation. The discharge would be to <br />springs and, thus, some groundwater could eventually recharge the alluvial material of Good Spring <br />Creek. <br />Transmissivity of the Williams Fork Formation is presented in Section 2.04.7. Measured and published <br />transmissivities of the upper Williams Fork Formation average about 50 square feet per day (ft2/d). The <br />average hydraulic conductivity of the formation is about 1 foot per day (ft/d). The values utilized to <br />calculate these averages are presented in Table 2.04.7-26 and are from published data (Robson and <br />Stewart, 1990; tables 5 and 6; upper member Williams Fork Formation). <br />A rectangular infiltration area in the undisturbed pit highwall of 133 feet long by 133 feet high could <br />transmit all of the estimated 92 gpm (approximately 150 acre-feet) of annual recharge from the reclaimed <br />pit. This is calculated as follows: <br />Annual seepage from the pit = <br />(133 ft high)(133 ft long)(1 ft/d) = 17,710 ft3/d = 150 ac-ft/yr. <br />With approximately 400,000 square feet of buried highwall, all of the meteoric water infiltrating into the <br />reclaimed pit that contacts the pit wall is expected to enter the strata of the Williams Fork Formation. <br />South Taylor/Lower Wilson — Rule 2, Page 82 Revision Date: 4/7/17 <br />Revision No.: RN -07 <br />