Laserfiche WebLink
,,, /, <br /> 7 <br /> '\1%-) <br /> Glenwood Springs Office GARFIELD & HECHT P.C. RECENED <br /> 901 Grand Avenue,Suite 201 r� 1 'ZULU <br /> Glenwood Springs,Colorado 81601 ATTORNEYS AT LAW APR G <br /> Telephone(970)947-1936 Since 1975 <br /> Facsimile(970)947-1937 DIVISION OF PrCIAl+�TlON <br /> '.v .carticldhecht.com NpNINGAN� <br /> April 10, 2020 <br /> David H. McConaughy <br /> dmcconaughy'a gar1icldhecht.com <br /> Ms. Amy Yeldell <br /> Environmental Protection Specialist <br /> Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br /> Department of Natural Resources <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br /> Denver, CO 80203 <br /> ami.y eldell(u statc.co.us <br /> • <br /> Re: Mid-Continent LST, Permit No. M-1982-121 <br /> Dear Ms. Yeldell: <br /> I wrote you on November 6, 2019,to advise you that this firm represents RMR Industrials, <br /> Inc., which has recently changed its corporate name to Rocky Mountain Industrials, Inc. We also <br /> represent the affiliated Colorado entity RMR Aggregates, Inc. <br /> My client forwarded a copy of your letter to Greg Dangler dated April 6, 2020, asking for <br /> information concerning a letter from Garfield County dated March 31, 2020. My client had not <br /> actually received Garfield County's letter before you forwarded it, most likely because it was <br /> addressed incorrectly. This letter will respond to your inquiries and update the information <br /> provided in my November 6, 2019, letter. <br /> As you know, my client is presently in litigation against Garfield County in both state and <br /> federal court to challenge the Notice of Violation dated May 8,2019(the"2019 Notice"). The new <br /> Notice of Violation of March 31, 2020 (the "2020 Notice") raises a single issue which is identical <br /> to issue#3 in the 2019 Notice. Both alleged violations reference a seasonal restriction imposed by <br /> County Resolution No. 2009-97. The seasonal restriction was included in Resolution No. 2009-97 <br /> to mirror a similar restriction imposed by the BLM. However, the BLM has routinely granted <br /> exemptions to that restriction, including during 2018-2019 and 2019-2020. Garfield County has <br /> advised me that it cannot honor that exemption and that it has no process to grant an exemption <br /> without formal amendment of the County permit. In the litigation, my client has challenged the <br /> County's authority to enforce this restriction when the BLM has specifically granted an exemption <br /> on preemption and other grounds. Notably, the BLM has determined that the restriction would <br /> have no impact on wildlife migration this year or last year,which was the reason for the restriction <br /> in the first place. As such, there is no present environmental or scientific basis to impose the <br /> restriction. <br />