My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-04-06_PERMIT FILE - M2019054 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2019054
>
2020-04-06_PERMIT FILE - M2019054 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2024 6:46:14 PM
Creation date
4/7/2020 5:02:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2019054
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/6/2020
Doc Name
Comment
From
Skull Creel Residents
To
DRMS
Email Name
SJM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the 4.5 mm/day recommended rate,the mine would consume its annual allotment of 325,851 gal (1 ac- <br /> ft/yr) in 18.8 days. <br /> 325,851 gal x 1 day =4.2 days <br /> 76,925 gal <br /> 325,851 gal x 1 day =0.085 days= 1 hr <br /> 3,846,234 gal <br /> 325,851 gal x 1 day = 18.8 days <br /> 17,284 gal <br /> Even if the assumed acreage of active mine requiring dust suppression is over estimated,and only 5%of <br /> the mine is worked at any point in time, 5%of the 140 acre mine=7 ac,+7.98 ac of CR 104= 14.98 ac <br /> requiring dust suppression.At the 4.5 mm/day recommended rate,the mine would consume its annual <br /> allotment of 325,851 gal (1 ac-ft/yr) in 4.5 days. <br /> 4.5 mm x 14.98 ac x 43,560 ft2 x 1 inch x 1 ft x 7.48 gal = 72,061 gal per day <br /> day 1 ac 25.4 mm 12 in ft3 <br /> 325,851 gal x 1 day = 4.5 days <br /> 72,061 gal <br /> These calculations demonstrate that regardless of the assumptions that are made with respect to the <br /> number of acres requiring dust suppression and the rate of application of water to provide that dust <br /> suppression,the proposed mine's well,at 15 gpm and 1 acre-ft per year, is grossly inadequate to <br /> provide dust suppression to the affected area. <br /> Two conclusions can be drawn from these calculations and the literature reviewed. If the mine provides <br /> adequate water to suppress dust in the footprint of the mine and surrounding county roads that will see <br /> dramatically increased truck traffic,given the historical presence of uranium mines and resulting surface <br /> disturbances, significant water introduced in an effort to suppress dust could result in radionuclide <br /> contamination being carried into the subsurface aquifer as occurred at the Hanford DOE site (Water <br /> Application for Dust Control in the Central Plateau: Impacts,Alternatives,and Work Strategies; <br /> September 2018,by Yonkofski, CMR et al., Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract <br /> DE-AC05-76RL01830, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory). <br /> The second conclusion that can be drawn is that if inadequate dust suppression occurs, significant <br /> quantities of dust will be entrained due to heavy truck traffic resulting from mining and transportation <br /> activities in an area that usually sees only residential traffic volumes. The nature of that dust, due to the <br /> presence of historic mine tailings and residuals that contain radionuclides,will present air quality and <br /> public health issues to the surrounding residents. The mine should be required to monitor the air along <br /> Moffat CR 104 and Old Mine Road to determine pre-and post-mine PM 10 and PM 2.5 concentrations, <br /> and analyze the particulate matter collected in PM 10 and 2.5 collection devices for hazardous air <br /> pollutants including uranium, radium, and vanadium. If levels are detected which exceed human health <br /> standards,the mine must be required to abate the problem at once. <br /> Skull Creek Homeowners pg 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.