My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-03-30_HYDROLOGY - M1981021
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1981021
>
2020-03-30_HYDROLOGY - M1981021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2021 3:07:19 PM
Creation date
3/30/2020 2:06:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981021
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
3/30/2020
Doc Name
Hydrogeology Report
From
Western Water & Land, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
LJW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUNDAY MINE COMPLEX-HYDROGEOLOGIC REPORT <br /> minerals such as gypsum, anhydrite, halite, and nahcolite possibly accompanied by cation <br /> exchange (calcium in place of sodium) are likely controlling water chemistry in the Top Rim unit. <br /> This process may account for the presence of sulfate and the lack of calcium at well MW-SUN1 <br /> compared to upgradient well locations. The source of the salt minerals may be within the Top <br /> Rim unit itself, but it is possible that salts were introduced to the Salt Wash during structural salt <br /> intrusions associated with the Paradox Member of the Hermosa Formation prior to a complete <br /> breach of the Gypsum Valley anticline. The dominant presence of sodium and potassium in the <br /> groundwater may suggest similar sources. It is common in deep aquifer systems, where little to <br /> no aquifer refreshing occurs from surface or near surface recharge, that downgradient locations <br /> are more saline due to the higher residence time that has occurred. This would be expected in <br /> the Salt Wash Member in the study area and can explain why overall TDS is greater at the well <br /> MW-SUN1 location. <br /> Water chemistry can vary dramatically from strata to strata within the Salt Wash Member as <br /> demonstrated in underground wells installed by Denison in the West Sunday Mine (Denison, <br /> 2012). Monitoring wells screened in the Top Rim unit showed distinctly different chemistry than <br /> a well screened in an underlying mudstone and siltstone unit. The mudstone/siltstone unit <br /> showed a TDS concentration 10 times greater than the Top Rim Sandstone unit. The two <br /> sampled wells that were screened in the Top Rim Sandstone unit had arsenic, molybdenum, <br /> uranium, and vanadium concentrations and gross alpha activities significantly greater than the <br /> well screened in the siltstone unit. Whereas the siltstone unit showed consistently higher <br /> concentrations of other metals including calcium, chloride, cobalt, copper, lithium, magnesium, <br /> manganese, potassium, sodium, sulfate, and zinc. It should be considered, however, that any <br /> geologic media that is recently saturated, as may be the case with these sediments, may not <br /> reflect water chemistry that represents chemical equilibrium. It may require multiple pore <br /> volumes of groundwater displacement and a significant amount of residence time to reach this <br /> equilibrium. <br /> The overall lack of minor and trace metals in the Top Rim Sandstone of the Salt Wash as shown <br /> in the data is a characteristic worth noting, but is not surprising considering the relatively high <br /> pH of the groundwater. Metals may exist in the formation but may not be soluble under these <br /> conditions. <br /> Table 10-5 presents the constituents in the groundwater samples that exceed Colorado <br /> BSGWs. The main constituents of concern are considered to be uranium and the radiological <br /> Western Water& Land, Inc. 47 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.