My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-03-30_HYDROLOGY - M1981021
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1981021
>
2020-03-30_HYDROLOGY - M1981021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2021 3:07:19 PM
Creation date
3/30/2020 2:06:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981021
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
3/30/2020
Doc Name
Hydrogeology Report
From
Western Water & Land, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
LJW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUNDAY MINE COMPLEX-HYDROGEOLOGIC REPORT <br /> connected to overlying water bearing units besides the Salt Wash Member Top Rim Sandstone. <br /> Possible overlying water-bearing units include the Burro Canyon Formation, which forms <br /> bedrock at the MW-SUN2 location, the 40-foot lens of conglomerate that is located in the <br /> Brushy Basin Member above the Salt Wash Member (as shown in page 2 of 2 of Figure 11-1), <br /> or other water bearing units in the Salt Wash. This may be occurring because of an inadequate <br /> well completion (leaking annular seal, or cracked well casing). This is also the same well that <br /> experienced difficulties in obtaining a packer seal, as discussed previously in Section 9.1.2. <br /> Because water levels of well MW-SUN2 do not appear to be representative of the Salt Wash <br /> aquitard, water levels from this well were not used in the consideration of a general <br /> potentiometric surface map for the SMC area. <br /> Similar to well MW-SUN2, but to a lesser degree, the observed water levels in well MW-SUN1 <br /> are also not particularly agreeable with a conventional model that would propose a uniform <br /> potentiometric surface in the SMC area. But this depends also on how one interprets rising <br /> water levels observed in the underground workings and that of well MW-SUN 1. For example, <br /> the head measured in well MW-SUN1 may be representative of the confined conditions at that <br /> location, and the head in upgradient areas may be more transient and rising toward the MW- <br /> SUN1 water levels. In addition, open historic drill holes that penetrated water bearing units in <br /> the Brushy Basin Member and were later mined through in the Top Rim of the Salt Wash <br /> Member may be contributing additional water and hydraulic head at some locations within the <br /> mine workings. <br /> Water levels recently collected in several vent shafts as well as historical levels observed in <br /> underground workings have contributed to an understanding of groundwater conditions in the <br /> Salt Wash further northeast of the monitoring wells. Water levels measured at vent shafts have <br /> been used to project the current mine potentiometric surface and indicate the level of flooded <br /> mine workings. <br /> Observations by Denison in 2009 during underground well installations in the West Sunday <br /> Mine indicated that saturation of the Top Rim Sandstone occurred below the flooded level in the <br /> mine, but not upgradient of this location. Miners also have made comments that mining in most <br /> of the worked areas yielded no to very little groundwater (Rutter, 2020). After periods of inactive <br /> mining operations, the deepest workings flood from groundwater inflow. There is no detailed <br /> information on the character of mine inflow, but flow originates from the deepest workings, not <br /> from upgradient areas inside the mines. <br /> Western Water& Land, Inc. 41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.