My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-02-26_REVISION - M2002004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2020-02-26_REVISION - M2002004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2024 5:38:41 PM
Creation date
2/26/2020 1:33:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/26/2020
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Resource Hydrogeologic Services
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR7
Email Name
JPL
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Creation Date: Revision Date: <br /> CC 02/28/2003 2/19/2020 <br /> 4**,�G Control Number <br /> PUE.EN.D.026.04 Pa e:5 of 30 <br /> Title: Sampling and Analysis Plan for Environmental Groundwater Monitoring <br /> 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SAMPLING OBJECTIVES <br /> This Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) provides a protocol for performance of shallow <br /> groundwater monitoring at the GCC Rio Grande, Inc. facility in Pueblo, Colorado (the Site). <br /> Based on increased knowledge of the groundwater system at the Site, groundwater monitoring <br /> locations and requirements have evolved significantly since the previous SAP was prepared in <br /> 2003 (Brown and Caldwell,2003).As a result of subsequent findings, and in accordance with <br /> Technical Revision No.3 (TR-03)approved by the Colorado Division of Reclamation,Mining <br /> and Safety(DRMS) in April 2013, all shallow wells subject to prior monitoring were plugged <br /> and abandoned except for one(MW-005,hereinafter referred to as MW-5). The plugged wells <br /> were either dry,or were located far from the site along the St.Charles River and proven to not <br /> be applicable for GCC monitoring. MW-5, located north of the plant, has remained dry since <br /> it was installed so no samples have been collected.Pursuant to TR-06, approved by DRMS in <br /> July 2017,new wells MW-6 and MW-7 were installed in December 2017 downgradient of the <br /> second mine panel (Figure 1). <br /> This SAP describes groundwater sampling and analysis procedures for obtaining chemical data <br /> from existing wells, and future wells installed as mining progresses, to define the baseline <br /> groundwater conditions and track any changes in applicable water quality constituents in <br /> potentially affected groundwater. Significant changes to the sampling protocol(s) will be <br /> submitted to DRMS for approval prior to implementation. <br /> The following sections provide details of the SAP, including sample locations and frequency, <br /> sampling methods, laboratory analysis, quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC), and <br /> reporting. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND FREQUENCY <br /> Figure 1 illustrates the site features and mine plan. GCC quarries the Fort Hayes Limestone <br /> Member of the Niobrara Formation, and began extraction and processing in 2007 and 2008, <br /> respectively. GCC is permitted to quarry the Fort Hayes Limestone and approximately 5 feet <br /> into the Codell Sandstone, which has also been described as hard, brown sandy petroliferous <br /> limestone and a platy and shaly sandstone. Figure 2 shows a site stratigraphic section. Site <br /> drilling logs indicate that the Codell also contains multiple shale or sandy shale lenses.Initially, <br /> GCC planned to remove and process Codell Sandstone,but that was eliminated near the onset <br /> of operations when further testing determined the material was not beneficial to process.GCC <br /> extracts only the Fort Hayes, leaving the bottom one foot of the limestone. <br /> Regionally,the Juana Lopez Shale Member separates the Fort Hayes and Codell members,but <br /> is only about 2 feet thick. Locally, the Juana Lopez Member is largely absent due to an <br /> erosional unconformity, such that the Fort Hayes directly overlies the Codell (Collum, 2000). <br /> Underlying the Codell is approximately 400 feet of upper Cretaceous members, principally <br /> composed of dense shales, which provides an effective hydraulic barrier from the underlying <br /> Dakota Sandstone aquifer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.