Laserfiche WebLink
Jacob P Ulrich—Adequacy Review—M-2019-057 <br /> February 19, 2020 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> this estimate to review it for sufficiency.Please note,the USFS may require an additional bond to be posted <br /> yi0with their agency to cover any reclamation tasks outside of jurisdiction of the Division.At this time,upon <br /> „p9 approval of the application,the required financial warranty for the proposed operation will be set at <br /> , $1,200.00;please contact me prior to the decision date to discuss any questions regarding the cost estimate <br /> /� or if you identify any errors with this calculation. <br /> 0" EXHIBIT D—Reclamation Plan(Rule 6.3.4) <br /> 6. Included on the Exhibit E Mine Plan Map is a note regarding existing disturbances within the proposed <br /> permit boundary. In accordance with Rule 6.3.5(2)(f),please discuss if these existing disturbances will be <br /> re-disturbed as a part of theroposed operation and if so please provide details of the associated reclamation <br /> of the re-disturbance. 11 OI oNr1 —ro-R t-Dkc"t1✓ , c'-T 114 is -h '<js. S -VCjS <br /> a w 1(1 24avk 4.320, 3�v - 2 - to -Low <br /> 7. The Mining and Reclamation Plans state that activities will be limited to 200 cubic yards and 0.15 acres of <br /> disturbance each season.The reclamation cost estimate discussed above includes a task to backfill and grade <br /> Jv 200 cubic yards of material as this would be the"worse-case"scenario at any given time.However,the <br /> estimate does not include the 0.15 acre area because the Division needs to bond for a larger area to reseed <br /> than what is disturbed in any one season as it may take several seasons to obtain successful revegetation on <br /> the reclaimed areas.Please commit to a specific maximum disturbance acreage whereas the cumulative total <br /> acreage of disturbance will not exceed this maximum disturbance.In the future when approaching this <br /> maximum disturbance,you may either submit a Technical Revision to the permit to increase the size of the <br /> maximum disturbance or utilize the Division's Surety Reduction/Acreage Reduction Release Request <br /> processes to gain credit for completed reclamation tasks/successful revegetation to then apply the associated <br /> bond on the additional disturbance.Please note,the reclamation cost estimate discussed above includes a 0.5 <br /> acre maximum disturbance for your reference. ,_....\ <br /> J`gu 2—,Z o —ZvZo ` u"--- 466%°14-JJ SQ <br /> EXHIBIT E—Map(Rule 6.3.5) <br /> S. Included on the Exhibit E Mine Plan Map is a note regarding existing disturbances within the proposed <br /> J permit boundary and states the Operator will work with the USFS and the Division to document these <br /> J' ,) disturbances.In accordance with Rule 6.3.5(2)(f),please submit a map which outlines and labels the <br /> existing disturbances within and adjacent to the permit boundary OR commit to submitting_a report prior to <br /> Zt) commencement of mining activities which documents the existing disturbances(reference map,coordinates, <br /> 2- photographs,etc.). (Ai' W 1 (i Cok-km 11 '-dee hati.eiu q 1)00...... t <br /> J �. 1 or-}'� "�C1�v iISS <br /> EXHIBIT F—List of Other Permits and Licenses Required(Rule 6.3.6) 51-4.,'-Ti q Cjr\ (o /01 ko ZO <br /> 9. As the proposed operation has an approved MPO from the USFS,there may now be discrepancies <br /> J between the USFS permit and the 110(1)permit application following the Division's technical review and <br /> your subsequent adequacy review responses. Please commit to informing the USFS of any revisions to <br /> your proposed operation once the Division approves your application. ,.i.rcorvil (u <br /> (J L Cows r-A rt TJ I <br /> EXHIBIT I-Proof of Filing with County Clerk(Rule 6.3.9) U5*-- e) o f To 5-1.14<-T 1 I <br /> 10. Any changes or additions to the application on file with the Division,must also be reflected in the public <br /> ` review copy. Please submit proof that the public review copy has been updated or a copy of the response <br /> � <br /> 1 �J to this adequacy letter has been added to it. <br /> t‘77, 4 <br /> _ C� <br /> `.J� I p ED <br /> This concludes the Division's adequacy review of this application. This letter shall not be interpreted to mean that <br /> there are no other technical deficiencies in your application; other issues may arise as additional information is <br />