My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-02-11_REVISION - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2020-02-11_REVISION - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2024 5:12:48 PM
Creation date
2/12/2020 6:58:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/11/2020
Doc Name
Adequacy Review - Preliminary
From
DRMS
To
Trapper Mining Inc
Type & Sequence
TR124
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Forrest Luke <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> 2020 January <br /> Rule: 2.10 Maps and Plans <br /> 2020 February DBMS: DRMS finds that Trapper addressed this rule adequately with the exception <br /> of: <br /> 1. As it appears that over time pit nomenclature has changed, please update Map M4A, Pit <br /> Boundaries, to show contemporary pit naming conventions as well as original pit names. <br /> Please put the original pit names in parentheses. The M4A map was not included in the <br /> submission. <br /> Maps <br /> M9: Haul Roads Elevation call outs need to be darker in the future <br /> MIOA: Mining and Regrade See comment in <br /> MIOB: Stripping and Reclaim Adequate <br /> M12: Post Mining Topo Adequate except for minimal topo lines in <br /> M14: Drainage Profiles Adequate <br /> M14A: Pre and Post Mining Profiles Adequate <br /> Rule: 2.04.7 (2), (3) Hydrology Surface Water <br /> 2020 February DBMS: <br /> 2. DRMS understands that mining in the N pit is anticipated to occur at significant depths <br /> (1,600 feet may be possible), that may not have previously been considered and that <br /> additional dewatering wells will be installed. Please discuss to what extent if any, as per <br /> Rules 2.07(1)(a) and 4.05.11, any possible negative impacts to ground water due to depth <br /> of miming that could occur . <br /> 3. Also include in this discussion possible impacts to developed water wells and water rights <br /> in the area as per Rules 2.05.6 (below), and 4.05.11; Mitigation of Impacts and Ground <br /> Water Protection respectively. To what extent if any, could wells be impacted by heavy <br /> equipment operations, blasting, augering and deep mining? <br /> Rule: 2.05.3 Operational Plan <br /> 2020 February DBMS: DRMS finds the submitted revised pages address this rule adequately with <br /> the exception of the following: <br /> 4. No overburden volumes nor swell factors were included in the Reclamation Plan <br /> discussion on revised pages 3-15b and 3-15c. Please include this information in the <br /> discussion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.