My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-02-07_REVISION - M1977211 (14)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977211
>
2020-02-07_REVISION - M1977211 (14)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:44:29 PM
Creation date
2/10/2020 8:17:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977211
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/7/2020
Doc Name Note
Exponent Reort
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Continental Materials Corp.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM4
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1100318 R0T0 0811 JRW1 44 <br />Therefore, backfilling Area H was occurring according to the requirements established in the <br />1994 Amendment and was not the cause or a contributing factor to Pikeview Landslide. <br />6.2 Over Steepening & Poor Rock Quality of the Highwall <br />Slope <br />Over steeping of the highwall slope and poor rock quality of the highwall slope are present in <br />large areas of the Pikeview Quarry and have been identified as a potential destabilizing factor at <br />the Pikeview Quarry.62 The most conspicuous example is the north end of the west wall. This <br />slope (“Kiewit Cliffs”) has been stable for decades and not experienced a mass failure, such as <br />the Pikeview Landslide. The north end of the west wall contains Manitou Formation limestone <br />similar to that in the area of the slope that failed in the Pikeview Landslide. The conclusion <br />from this performance is that over steepening and poor rock quality of the highwall slope have <br />not resulted in slope failures at the Pikeview Quarry similar to the Pikeview Landslide. Rather, <br />the otherwise good slope stability experienced at Pikeview Quarry indicates that in the absence <br />of a clay bed, the slopes are stable. Therefore, over steepening and poor rock quality are not <br />considered the cause or a contributing factor to the Pikeview Landslide. <br />6.3 Rainfall/High Groundwater <br />Rainfall and potentially high groundwater are common causes of landslides, and these factors <br />have been postulated as a potential cause of the Pikeview Landslide.63, 64, 65 At the time of <br />initiation of the Pikeview Landslide, the daily antecedent rainfall had been minimal as seen in <br />Appendix 45. Based on the running total data for 7, 28, 60, 90, and 120 days, no significant <br />rainfall maxima were present as of December 2, 2008. The combined groundwater and rain data <br />contained in Appendix 44 indicates a rapid response of the Area H piezometers, P-2, and P-1 to <br /> <br />62 J. Davidson, United States Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration, Technical Support, <br />Slope Stability Evaluation, Pikeview Quarry – (ID No 05-1443), September 17, 1986 (Appendix 49) <br />63 CTL Thompson, Slope Stability Evaluation, Pikeview Quarry, Castle Concrete, Colorado Springs, Colorado <br />Springs, May 19, 2009 (Appendix 50) <br />64 CTL Thompson, DRAFT 2010 Mined Land Reclamation Plan Amendment No. 4, Pikeview Quarry (A.K.A. <br />Castle Pit), Permit No. M-1977-211, June 30, 2010 (Appendix 51) <br />65 State of Colorado, Colorado Geological Survey, Review of Slope Stability Evaluation Pike View Quarry, <br />September 10, 2009 (Appendix 52)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.