Laserfiche WebLink
From: Brown-DNR.Garver <br /> To: Austin Malotte <br /> Cc: Jara Johnson-DNR <br /> Subject: Re:2020 exchange to Detroit City Mine <br /> Date: Monday,January 13,2020 9:32:40 AM <br /> Attachments: mage001.Dno <br /> Hello Austin, <br /> The idea of capturing tributary water in a small sump near the mine portal and using <br /> this point of diversion in conjunction with the currently established diversion point <br /> sounds fine to me as long as diversions at both points are metered and the conditions <br /> of the temporary lease with HASP are adhered to. As I mentioned during our last <br /> phone conversation, I would like to visit the site and have a look at the diversion <br /> points once things melt this spring and access becomes easier. If there are any <br /> concerns after the visit I will notify you, but for now I think this plan sounds fine. <br /> Best Regards, <br /> Garver Brown <br /> Water Commissioner <br /> Division 1, District 23 <br /> A <br /> P: 719-836-2557 <br /> PO Box 1949 <br /> Fairplay, CO 80440 <br /> 2arver.brownPstate.co.us I Division of Water Resources I Colorado Stream Flows <br /> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 9:09 AM Austin Malotte<amalotteUbbawater.com>wrote: <br /> Good morning Garver, <br /> When you have a minute, would you please confirm my summary below accurately reflects <br /> our discussion on Thursday last week, and provide your thoughts on the feasibility of <br /> operating the proposed second point of diversion by exchange?It sounds like DRMS would <br /> like something in writing indicating DWR will be okay with the mine's use of the water <br /> collecting near the mine portal. <br /> Thank you, <br /> Austin <br />