My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-12-13_REVISION - M1980244 (62)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2019-12-13_REVISION - M1980244 (62)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2025 2:23:12 AM
Creation date
12/17/2019 8:32:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/13/2019
Doc Name Note
Appendix 9
Doc Name
Request For Amendment To Permit
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM13
Email Name
TC1
MAC
BFB
ERR
JPL
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the Toe of the Designed Slopes. This study investigated potential slope stability <br /> issues related to stopes that will be exposed in the toe of the east wall of the Cresson <br /> Mine and the risk they may pose to overall wall stability. <br /> • (October 2012) Evaluation of Dike Plane Shear Sliding Potential—East Cresson <br /> 9525 Ramp. This report summarized the analysis of potential plane shear sliding on a <br /> phonolite dike which was striking parallel to the pit. <br /> • (October 2014) Cripple Creek July 2014 Cell Mapping Summary. This memo <br /> summarized the results of a geotechnical surface mapping campaign in both the <br /> WHEX and Cresson mines performed during July 2014. <br /> In the November 2015 CNI Report, Table 1-1 shows various recommended interramp slope <br /> angles for various sectors (1-14) for the areas of excavation. This Table is copied in Attachment <br /> 2 to this Exhibit T. CC&V is following these recommendations. The Map on the following page <br /> from the CNI Report shows the critical cross sections in relation to CR 82. These are listed <br /> below with their respective slope stability safety factors: <br /> Section Min. Factor of Safety Comments <br /> WH-3 1.84 Road is close to edge of <br /> excavation <br /> WH-4 2.28 <br /> GH-4 1.52 Road is closest to edge of <br /> Excavation <br /> GH-6 1.43 <br /> These factors of safety meet the minimum requirements. The cross sections showing the worst <br /> case failure lines are included in Attachment T-2 at the end of Exhibit T. In the DRMS second <br /> adequacy review of Amendment 11, The Division questioned the fact that Cross Sections GH-4 <br /> and GH-6 showed a failure line that included Teller County Road 82. CNI responded that only <br /> the lines of the minimum factor of safety were shown on the cross sections. They provided a <br /> response letter with revised cross sections for GH-4 and GH-6 showing other failure lines with <br /> higher factors of safety. These sections and their response are included in Attachment T-2. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.