My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-12-13_REVISION - M1980244 (62)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2019-12-13_REVISION - M1980244 (62)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2025 2:23:12 AM
Creation date
12/17/2019 8:32:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/13/2019
Doc Name Note
Appendix 9
Doc Name
Request For Amendment To Permit
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM13
Email Name
TC1
MAC
BFB
ERR
JPL
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The following narrative on the slope stability analyses was extracted from the body of the CNI Report: <br /> OVERALL ANALYSIS <br /> Overall slope stability analyses were performed using the slope stability computer <br /> program SLOPEW0, which implements the limit-equilibrium method of slices. Ten cross <br /> sections were selected for analysis based on wall height, overall slope angle, and RQD. These <br /> ten cross sections are presented on plan maps of the mines with projected exposed geology on <br /> Figures 7-1 and 7-2, and with projected exposed RQD on Figures 7-3 and 7-4. The analysis <br /> methodology and results are presented below. <br /> 7.1 Discussion of Overall Stability <br /> Stress levels in slopes can locally exceed rock-mass strengths. The strength of the rock <br /> mass must be evaluated and compared to the predicted stresses based on geotechnical, <br /> geological, and geomechanical parameters. Overall slope failures are generally associated with <br /> one or more of the following characteristics: <br /> • Major through-going structures that form daylighted and non-daylighted <br /> geometries in the mine wall <br /> • Low rock-mass strength in the toe <br /> •A ubiquitous pitward-dipping joint set <br /> • High-angle faults or continuous joints that form back and side releases for <br /> slope movement <br /> • Saturated toe, excess hydraulic gradients, and localized high pore pressures <br /> • High in situ horizontal stresses <br /> These factors, alone or in combination with high mine slopes, can create conditions that <br /> lead to instability in the intermediate to ultimate walls. <br /> 7.2 SLOPEIW Limit-Equilibrium Analysis <br /> SLOPE/W is an overall slope stability computer program that implements conventional <br /> limit-equilibrium slope stability analysis. This is the most common slope stability method in <br /> geotechnical practice and investigates the equilibrium of a rock or soil mass tending to move <br /> down slope under the influence of gravity. Two-dimensional cross sections are analyzed <br /> assuming a condition of plane strain. It is assumed that the shear strengths of the materials <br /> along a potential failure surface follow a linear (Mohr-Coulomb) relationship between shear <br /> strength and the normal stress on the failure surface. A safety factor is derived from the ratio of <br /> the resisting forces and driving forces for many potential failure surfaces. The lowest factor of <br /> safety (FOS) obtained from the potential failure surfaces is the FOS assigned to the slope. <br /> Spencer's Method of Slices approach to solving the slice equilibrium equations was used <br /> to conduct the overall slope stability analyses. Spencer's method is preferred because it satisfies <br /> both force and moment equilibrium conditions, as opposed to some of the simpler algorithms <br /> which only satisfy subsets of the force and moment equilibrium. <br /> The probability offailure (POF) is calculated using the mean FOS and the FOS <br /> calculated when analyzing the slope with minus one standard deviation rock-mass strengths. The <br /> probability of failure is calculated using a closed form solution which assumes that the <br /> distribution offactors of safety is Gaussian (normal). <br /> 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.