Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> C,R.S. 34-32.6-11 4 (2019).. i <br /> 24. Any concerns regarding future enforcement�.en are r� grounds to deny <br /> Application under section �4� ��1�. . . <br /> Under Rules �.� and �.� the � � <br /> has adequate authori t inspect ax�� � soon <br /> � report violations the permit, the Rules <br /> theAct. , and <br /> 25. Under section 34-32#5'1 1 5 a C + # . r <br /> .R.S,. the Board or Division <br /> deny a reclamation permit If the application may <br /> c t x incomplete. Based on the record a • <br /> tes�imny presented Applicant t has submitted a complete application <br /> requirements� section an cox�plied <br /> with the e r�eants of section 34-32. -1.12, C.R.S. and Rule • <br /> �. ,�. there i no <br /> cause deny the application under section 34- <br /> 26. Reclamation plans for mining sites must provide that disturbances to the <br /> prevailing hydrologic balance of the affected and and surrounding areas, and to <br /> quality and quantity of to in su�wface �v e <br /> water aril unite systems, will be <br /> nirdied. -32. -11 hC.R.S.; Rule 3.1.6. In consideration or of the Application,inormatio from Applicant, and other information ox peserxted at the heming;xx�et their b �.'alen t � Applicant <br /> o prove compliance with section 3 -32.5-11 <br /> � � ) C.R.S. and Rule <br /> .I.6. <br /> 27. Reclamation pla .s must also comply with. <br /> th other provisions of section 3 # <br /> 32. -1.16 , C. .S., including, among they* ` ' <br /> th� � s, a �* �;sae grading of reclaimed <br /> slopes, d <br /> , proper topsoil management, adequate revs etation t • <br /> � g that�s compatible with the <br /> post-mining use, Here, Applicant has complied with the requirements of sections 34.2. -1 12 and 3 -32.5- 16 regarding reclamation and Rules 3.L and 6. . 'there is <br /> o cause to deny the Application under section 34-32,.5-115(4)(c) or (g), C.R.S. <br /> 28. The Applicant has • <br /> s also complied pl d ith RU:les 1. and 6, '• 4. s <br /> regxurements regarding wildlife. Based on the A li atioevidence <br /> rid presented, <br /> the Applicationadequatelytakes Into <br /> es account the safety and protection of wildlife <br /> at the proposed site. because it complies with � <br /> Rules 3.1. and .4. , wildlife issue <br /> are not cause t deny the Application s <br /> under section 3 -32.5-1 1� c C.R,S. <br /> 2 . Under section 34-32. <br /> 11 4 e , C.R.S. axed Rule . -1 the Bo <br /> den an �� ' � and may <br /> y application if the mining operation will ad rersel affect stability <br /> . . � � the tb�l�ty of any <br /> significant, valuable, and permanent ent manmade <br /> structure unless there is an <br /> agreement providing for compensation to the owner if the structure is damaged or, i <br /> no agreement is reached, the operator provides a engineering�n evaluation <br /> demonstrating that the structures will not � i <br /> e damaged �y the mining operation. In <br /> consideration the Application, information from . <br /> �►.ppl�cant, and other information <br /> presented at the hewing, demonstrate that Applicant'has entered into the required <br /> agreementsheir possible r� <br /> provided an engineering report required for <br /> sty*�x • the <br /> structures for which o agreement has been reached. There ' <br /> . o � no cause to deny the <br /> Appheation under section 34-32.5-115(4)(e), C.R.S. <br /> 4 <br /> .Albert Frei& Sons, Inc. <br /> 0 <br /> AFS-Bennet Pik-2001#03 <br /> 4 <br />