Laserfiche WebLink
�-j EXHIBIT L .pdf <br /> 171 K <br /> . EXHIBIT C-2 MINE PLAN SHEET 1.pdf <br /> 1256K <br /> Scott - DNR, Eric <eric.scott@state.co.us> Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:25 PM <br /> To: Peter Wayland <pwayland@weilandinc.com> <br /> Received, thank you. <br /> Eric Scott <br /> Environmental Protection Specialist, P.G., R.G. <br /> © COLORADO <br /> Division of Reclamation, <br /> Mining and Safety <br /> Depar tment of Natu at Resources <br /> P 303.866.3567 x 8140 1 F 303.832.8106 <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203 <br /> enc.scott@state.co.us I www.mining.state.co.us <br /> [O ,+_,,.tt.,xt hldd-E,l <br /> eric.scott@state.co.us <eric.scott@state.co.us> Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:33 PM <br /> To: pwayland@weilandinc.com, pwayland@weilandinc.com <br /> Your message <br /> To: pwayland@weilandinc.com <br /> Subject: RE: Amen permit review <br /> Sent: 12/3/19, 12:52:57 PM MST <br /> was read on 12/3/19, 1:33:16 PM MST <br /> Scott - DNR, Eric <eric.scott@state.co.us> Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 2:31 PM <br /> To: Peter Wayland <pwayland@weilandinc.com> <br /> Peter, <br /> Thanks for addressing those issues so quickly-you pre-empted the letter I was working on this afternoon.. I had a <br /> moment to take another, more in depth look at the submittal yesterday afternoon, but I only had a few remaining minor <br /> issues to ask you about/have addressed. I can put these in a formal letter if you wish, but I wanted to give you a heads <br /> up in case we need to discuss.. <br /> 1) The proposed anadarko pipelines located on the west side of Cell 2 are not shown on Exhibit F, Sheet 6. I'm sure the <br /> locations aren't finalized yet, but we need to have something showing a minimum setback of 47 feet between Cell 2 and <br /> those pipelines unless another agreement is reached with Anadarko. <br /> 2) Please have the permittee acknowledge the commitment to submitting a GW quality monitoring plan and completing <br /> background sampling prior to exposing GW. <br /> 3) It's been my observation that settling ponds are usually associated with the plant area (control of wash water and <br /> sediment) and not adjacent to the individual mining cells as shown on the map you just submitted. If this is the <br /> case,please revise the map, or the permittee will need to submit a TR to show the location and extent of pond to be <br /> associated with the plant, and account for it's reclamation, prior to installing/using it. <br /> 4) Please revise/resubmit the first page of the applicaiton form to match the new acreage total given by moving the <br /> permit boundary south and shown in the new legal description provided. <br />