My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-11-27_PERMIT FILE - M2019058 (20)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2019058
>
2019-11-27_PERMIT FILE - M2019058 (20)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2025 7:37:03 AM
Creation date
12/2/2019 12:10:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2019058
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/27/2019
Doc Name Note
Appendix 1 - Environmental Resource Report
Doc Name
Application
From
Colorado Sand Company LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
MAC
BFB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appendix-11 <br /> Keenesburg Project RETTEW Project No.114782000 <br /> Colorado Sand Company LLC April26,2019 <br /> The Plains pocket gopher(Geomys bursarius)is the most likely of the four Colorado pocket gopher species <br /> to be found in the project area because it prefers deep sandy and silty soils. Pocket gophers reduce <br /> productivity of portions of native grasslands by 20 to 50 percent (CSU, 2016). Evidence of small mammal <br /> burrows was observed at several locations across the project area during the site investigation.The Plains <br /> pocket gopher is not listed by the State of Colorado or protected under state law. <br /> 4.0 SOIL ASSESSMENT <br /> 4.1 Topography and Drainage <br /> The majority of the pr ject area consists of gently rolling, grazed rangeland. Review of the Tampa and <br /> Klug Ranch, Colorado United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles <br /> (Appendix A, Figure 1), shows an elevation between 4,950—4,600 feet above mean sea level. Drainage <br /> from the project area generally flows north from the site. <br /> 4.2 Soil Suivey <br /> Mapping depicting soil init boundaries within the project area is provided in Appendix A, Figure 3.A U.S. <br /> Department of Agricult ire (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service Custom Soil Resource Report <br /> is provided in Appendix E.A summary of the mapped soils is also provided in Table 4.1. Most of the project <br /> area consisted of sandy soils, although Loup-Boel loamy sands, 0-3% slopes occur in swales and <br /> drainageways in landfo m settings and are mapped within the drainage running through the east portion <br /> of Sections 1 and 12. Site specific soil information is also contained on the Sample Point Data Forms <br /> included in Appendix C. <br /> Table 4.1-Summary of Mapped Soils Data <br /> Map Unit Typical Soil Profile <br /> Symbol Map Unit Name Drainage Class <br /> y (in inches) <br /> Loup: H1—0 to 16; loamy <br /> sand <br /> 35 Loup-Boel Ioamy sands, 0 to 3%slopes H2—16 to 40; loamy sand Poorly drained <br /> H3—40 to 60; sandy loam <br /> Boel: H1—0 to 14; loamy sand <br /> H2—14 to 60; loamy sand <br /> H1—0 to 10; loamy sand <br /> 45 Oiney to my sand, 3 to 5%slopes H2—10 to 20; sandy clay loam Well drained <br /> H3—20 to 25; sandy clay loam <br /> H4—25 to 60;fine sandy loam <br /> H1—0 to 22; sand <br /> 49 Osgood sand, 0-3%slopes H2—22 to 34; sandy loam Well drained <br /> H3—34 to 60; sand <br /> A—0 to 5; sand <br /> 69 Valent sand, 0-3%slopes AC—5 to 12; sand Excessively <br /> C1-12 to 30; sand drained <br /> C2—30 to 80; sand <br /> A—0 to 5; sand <br /> 70 Vale t sand, 3-9%slopes AC—5 to 12; sand Excessively <br /> C1-12 to 30; sand drained <br /> C2—30 to 80; sand <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.