My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-11-12_REVISION - M2004044 (13)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2004044
>
2019-11-12_REVISION - M2004044 (13)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2025 6:22:11 AM
Creation date
11/12/2019 1:01:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004044
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/12/2019
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #3
From
Aggregate Industries
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
JLE
ERR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
w <br /> Jared Ebert <br /> November 8, 2019 <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br /> 1. The Exhibit C-2 Map indicates actual offset from mining excavation limits to the Brighton <br /> Return Flow Ditch is 501 feet. This is not reflective of the proposed mining plan or the applicable <br /> geotechnical stability cross sections and figures. Please address this discrepancy. <br /> Al Response: We have updated to the table to correct the typo. Please see attached <br /> revised Exhibit C. <br /> Mined Land Reclamation Board Conditions of Approval <br /> 44. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board ("Board") conditionally approved the original <br /> permit application for the permit number M-2004-044 for the Tucson South Resource site with <br /> five conditions. Please review and address each of the five conditions of approval. Please <br /> specifically explain how these conditions are addressed with this Amendment application. If the <br /> Applicant believes a condition is no longer applicable, please explain in detail the basis for that <br /> assumption. <br /> a. Condition No. 1 — If final specifications for construction of the slurry walls differ from the draft <br /> specifications, Aggregate Industries will provide DMG a copy of the final version for review, as a <br /> technical revision; <br /> i. Al Response: The applicant will comply with the condition as stated. <br /> ii. DRMS Response: This condition will remain in effect with the approval of AM01. <br /> b. Condition No. 2—Aggregate Industries' mining operation will not intersect ground water in <br /> Phases 2,3,'and 3A until the DMG has reviewed and accepted the final slurry wall construction <br /> report, including quality assurance test results; <br /> i. Al Response: The mining cells referenced above are now the East and West mining areas. <br /> The applicant will comply with the condition as required. <br /> ii. DRMS Response: This condition will remain in effect with the approval of AM01. <br /> c. Condition No. 3—Aggregate Industries will not expose ground water to the surface in Phases <br /> 1,2,3, or 3A until a copy of a document from the State Engineer's Office proving that it is legal to <br /> do so is provided to the DMG; <br /> i. Al Response: The applicant is in compliance with the above condition. An approved <br /> Temporary Substitute Supply Plan was submitted to the Division to address this condition. <br /> ii. DRMS Response: Based on the temporary substitute water supply plan submitted to the <br /> Division and the comment letter provided by the Colorado Division of Water Resources <br /> regarding AM01, the temporary substitute water supply plan (TSWSP) only covers the 2a acres <br /> of exposed groundwater of the pit located in Tract M. Per the DWR's December 12, 2018 <br /> comment letter, Al will need to obtain a new TSWSP and Well Permit to expose any additional <br /> water beyond the 2 acres. Given this, this condition has not been complied with and will remain <br /> in affect with the approval of AM01. <br /> Aggregate Industries—WCR,Inc <br /> 1687 Cole Blvd Suite 300 <br /> Golden,CO 80401 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.