My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-10-11_ENFORCEMENT - M1996076
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1996076
>
2019-10-11_ENFORCEMENT - M1996076
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2024 1:11:15 PM
Creation date
10/11/2019 2:15:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1996076
IBM Index Class Name
ENFORCEMENT
Doc Date
10/11/2019
Doc Name Note
Petition
From
MLRB
To
DRMS
Email Name
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
examination and cross examination, to present expert testimony, to challenge exhibits, and to <br /> make proper objections. These include, but are not limited to: <br /> 13. Evidence concerning adjudicated irrigation water rights held by Fontanari, the <br /> areas allowed to be irrigated by those rights, and historic irrigation practices, including evidence <br /> concerning "historic pastures" and the correct interpretation of Exhibit G to the Permit. <br /> 14. The testimony of the water superintendent of the State of Colorado who <br /> supervised the diversion and use of water in the applicable division, and who had direct <br /> knowledge of the Fontanari construction and diversions, both as to timing and dates, but also as <br /> to the priority of water rights enjoyed by Fontanari, their historic use and use on the permit lands <br /> at issue; <br /> 15. Development of an irrigation plan under professional supervision and expert <br /> control which included areas inside of the permit area, including expert testimony; <br /> 16. The conduct and supervision of the implementation of the irrigation plan <br /> developed by the expert; <br /> 17. Whether Operator had a good faith belief that irrigation was allowed within the <br /> permit area pursuant to Exhibit G to the permit; <br /> 18. The conduct of seeding of the area which was ultimately placed under irrigation; <br /> 19. Lay and expert testimony regarding rockfall mitigation efforts by DOT, including <br /> testimony as to whether blasting, air bag removal and the use of heavy equipment to remove <br /> large rocks was, or was not, related to the Fontanari irrigation, or even related in any way, <br /> including testimony of rockfall mitigation in this area going back many years. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.