My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-10-10_HYDROLOGY - M1980244 (18)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2019-10-10_HYDROLOGY - M1980244 (18)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2025 5:31:25 AM
Creation date
10/10/2019 3:12:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
10/10/2019
Doc Name Note
Waste Rock Geochemical Characterization Study Report
Doc Name
Vol. I, Part 1 of 6
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fe ITASCK <br /> Denver, Inc. <br /> minerals present in waste rock. As shown in Equation 3.1, the oxidation of 1 mole of pyrite to a <br /> mole of iron oxide and 2 moles of dissolved sulfate generates 4 moles of acidity. <br /> FeS2+ 15/402 + 7/2112O-> Fe(OH)3+ 2SO42-+4H+ (3.1) <br /> The AGP of a sample is typically calculated based on the sulfur content of the sample and the <br /> stoichiometry of pyrite oxidation, as shown in Equation 3.1. <br /> Different forms of sulfur may be quantified during ABA analysis, including sulfide-sulfur, soluble <br /> sulfate-sulfur, and insoluble sulfate-sulfur. In the Nevada Modified Sobek method, the sulfur <br /> speciation is conducted through a series of wet-chemical-leach sulfur analyses. The procedure <br /> consists of analysis of total sulfur by combustion-infrared spectrophotometer (i.e., a LECOT^° <br /> furnace or similar) followed by analysis of sample duplicates after partial decomposition by <br /> chemical digestion. The chemical digestions (and calculated speciation) include the following: <br /> 1. Hot-water-extractable sulfur (total sulfur from untreated sample minus total sulfur after <br /> extraction with hot water) is attributed to water-soluble sulfates, including acid-forming <br /> sulfates, such as hydrous ferrous sulfates, and non-acid-forming sulfates, such as gypsum <br /> and epsomite (Li et al. 2007). <br /> 2. HCI-extractable sulfur (total sulfur from untreated sample minus hot-water-extractable <br /> sulfur minus total sulfur after extraction with HCI) is attributed to less soluble sulfates, <br /> including jarosite and alunite, and acid-dissociable sulfides, such as chalcopyrite, <br /> pyrrhotite, and sphalerite (NDEP 2015). <br /> 3. HNO3-extractable sulfur(total sulfur after sulfate extraction [HCI or hot water] minus total <br /> sulfur after extraction with 14% HNO3) is attributed to pyritic sulfide-sulfur. <br /> 4. Non-extractable sulfur (total sulfur after HNO3 extraction) is attributed to organic sulfur. <br /> The Nevada Modified Sobek method uses the sum of sulfide-sulfur and soluble-sulfate sulfur for <br /> the calculation of AGP (NDEP 2015). The sulfur content in weight percent is converted to AGP in <br /> units of kilograms of calcium carbonate per ton (kg CaCO3/t) by multiplying by the conversion <br /> factor 31.25 based on the stoichiometry shown in Equation 3.1. <br /> 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.