2019-09-19_REVISION - M2002120 ‎(17)‎

• Permit No: M2002120
• IBM Index Class Name: REVISION
• Doc Date: 9/19/2019
• Doc Name: Adequacy Review Response #2
• From: Civil Resources
• To: DRMS
• Type & Sequence: AM1
• Email Name: ECS
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Andy Rodriguez
From: Matthew Gould <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 8:36 AM
To: Mark Johnson
Cc: Andy Rodriguez
Subject: RE: legal right enter
Mark:
I apologize for my delay. I am working on this now.
Matt
From: Mark Johnson <[e-mail]>
Sent:Tuesday, September 10, 2019 9:52 AM
To: Matthew Gould <[e-mail]>
Cc:Andy Rodriguez<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: legal right enter
Yes sir that will work.Thanks
Mark Johnson
Compliance Manager I Facilities and Acquisitions
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Excellence • Integrity• Passion
From: Matthew Gould <[e-mail]>
Sent:Tuesday, September 10, 2019 9:50 AM
To: Mark Johnson <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: legal right enter
[External Email]
Mark:
Thank you. I'm afraid I'm running a bit behind on this.
Here is my question. If we back this up with a separate agreement that essentially states that the rights granted in this
instrument will not be exercised, can we record that separate agreement? I'm looking for a way to give you what you
need for the state without risking any compromise to the use of the site by any assignee who might not be bound by an
unrecorded agreement.
Matt
From: Mark Johnson <[e-mail]>
Sent:Wednesday,September 04, 2019 10:26 AM
1