My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-09-16_REVISION - M1994117 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1994117
>
2019-09-16_REVISION - M1994117 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2024 1:02:18 PM
Creation date
9/18/2019 8:15:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1994117
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/16/2019
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Colorado Milling Company
To
DRMS
Email Name
AME
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECEIVED <br /> COLORADO MILLING COMPANY, LLC <br /> P.O. sox 1523 SEP 16 2019 <br /> Longmont, Colorado 80502 <br /> DIVISION OF RECLAMATION <br /> MINING AND SAFETY <br /> *5wa!l �77q 11V1&d0f,' <br /> Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety September 15, 2019 <br /> Attention: Amy Eschberger <br /> 1313 Sherman Street—Room 215 <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> RE: Gold Hill Mill, Permit No. M-1994-117, Amendment Application <br /> (Revision No. AM-01), Adequacy Review No. 5 <br /> Attention: Amy Eschberger: <br /> This is the Colorado Milling Company, LLC's Response Letter to the items listed in Amy <br /> Eschberger's July 23, 2019 Adequacy Review No. 5 of the Application for an Amendment to the <br /> Gold Hill Mill Limited Impact 110 (2) Permit No. M-1994-117, to formally add the previously <br /> permitted Left Hand Creek Pump Station, Gold Hill Mill Pipeline, and the Times Mine adit portal <br /> to the affected land boundary of the Gold Hill Mill Permit. These three features are collectively <br /> referred to as the Gold Hill Mill Waterline in this Response Letter. In order to ensure that the <br /> responses to the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety's request for additional information <br /> and clarification can be properly reviewed, the responses are set out below each of Amy <br /> Eschberger's Adequacy Review comments. <br /> Exhibit C—Mining Plan (Rule 6.3.3): <br /> 1) The operator's response to Item no. 1(a) states the requested mine pool drawdown plan <br /> cannot be developed and submitted to the Division until a pumping test has been conducted at <br /> the site. Therefore, the Division has the following comments regarding this item: <br /> a. Please provide a pumping test plan detailing the proposed procedures. This plan should <br /> include a detailed description of how water pumped from the workings will be managed during <br /> testing, and whether a discharge permit will be required from the CDPHE, WQCD. <br /> CMC Response: The Times and Wynona Mines pump test has been designed to determine the <br /> mine pool volume above the collar of the winze that connects the Times Mine with the Wynona <br /> Mine workings. To perform this evaluation, mine pool drawdown data from a pumping test needs <br /> to be acquired. The pump test involves the following activity: <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.