My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-08-30_REVISION - C1981018
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2019-08-30_REVISION - C1981018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2024 9:15:10 AM
Creation date
9/3/2019 8:22:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/30/2019
Doc Name
Adequacy Review - Preliminary
From
DRMS
To
Blue Mountain Energy, Inc
Type & Sequence
TR72
Email Name
CCW
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kurt Blunt <br /> Page 2 of <br /> 001 <br /> of how this relates to requirements in their permit with the Colorado water <br /> Quality Control Division or to other water quality requirements. <br /> . on Page 3, in the third paragraph, the following sentence requires more <br /> explanation: "Based on experience with other sediment ponds at the base of refuse <br /> piles, lied wash Reservoir will likely remain dry.' This sentence is unclear to the <br /> Division for two reasons. First, will Iced wash be at the base of a refuse pile? <br /> Second, are you Mating that refuse piles at Deserado produce less runoff than <br /> typical rangeland? <br /> . Page 7 is not clear. It appears that the polygons represent different soil units, but <br /> the numbers for each type are not readable, Please provide a clearer version of <br /> this map. <br /> . Illustration 59 indicates that the l o-year discharge from the RP-A pond is 22.59 <br /> cfs, but in Illustration 60 the inflow to Fled wash Reservoir#2 is only 6.59 cfs <br /> to-year event). Is it your assumption that the flow from the upper pond (below <br /> the RP-A) will infiltrate between the two ponds? <br /> . On Map 163, the Rip Rap Chart indicates a Spillway Slope with a slope of %. <br /> Please show this location on the plan view. <br /> Mule 4.1 .4—Coal Mine Waste Bark Construction ReQuirements <br /> 10. Deserado Mine'Mine's proposed refuse pile RP-A did not provide information on how <br /> the subrde or foundation of RP-A will be developed prior to the placement of <br /> refuse. Please provide additional information regarding the subarade or <br /> foundation de elopmcnt to 1 P-A prior-to refuse placement. <br /> 11. In SIB Engineering & Testing, LLC's Deport, they discuss the potential of increased pore <br /> water pressures within the refuse pile with the burial of saturated refuse. An increase in <br /> pore water-pressure could impact the stability of the refuse pile. Given this concern, HB <br /> suggested the potential of including wire piezometers in the refuse pile to monitor pore <br /> pressure as an option. However, given the site's environment and characteristics, the <br /> requirement of pie ometers doesn't seem necessary under the assumption that refuse is <br /> allowed to properly dry before being spread, compacted and burled. Please provide <br /> information and discussion on how BME plans to allow refuse to reach an optimal stag <br /> prior to burial to insure stability of*IMP-A. <br /> This concludes the Division's preliminary adequacy review for the Iesrdo Tune's <br /> Technical Revision No. 72 Application. If you have any questions or concerns please <br /> feel free to contact me at l yton.wein@state.co.us or(303)-866-3567 x8144. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Clayton wein <br /> Environmental Protection Specialist <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.