Laserfiche WebLink
Cripple Creek&Victor Gold Mining Company <br /> Squaw Gulch VLF Phase 2A Part 1 ■ <br /> Record of Construction Report <br /> 475.0106.032 <br /> August 21,2019 <br /> were one sample for every 10,000 cy. One LDF sample was required to be tested for <br /> particle size and Atterberg limits. One LDF samples was tested with passing results. LDF <br /> laboratory testing is summarized in Table 9 and individual test results are presented in <br /> Appendix 1.5. <br /> 3.2.6. Soil Liner Fill <br /> The Squaw Gulch VLF Phase 2A Part 1 area was constructed by placing 24,670 cy of soil <br /> liner fill (SLF). The particle size distribution, Atterberg limits, laboratory compaction, and <br /> permeability testing frequencies were one sample for every 4,000 cy. Seven SLF record <br /> samples were required to be tested for particle size distribution, Atterberg limits, <br /> laboratory compaction, and permeability testing. Ten SLF record samples were tested <br /> with passing results. SLF laboratory testing is summarized in Table 10 and individual test <br /> results are presented in Appendix 1.6. <br /> The nuclear density/moisture testing frequency for SLF is one test for every 500 cy. A <br /> minimum of 50 SLF nuclear density/moisture tests were required. A total of 54 SLF <br /> nuclear density/moisture tests were performed with passing results. The depth check <br /> frequency for SLF is two checks for every acre. A minimum of 31 SLF depth checks were <br /> required.A total of 32 SLF depth checks were performed with passing results. SLF nuclear <br /> density/moisture testing and SLF depth checks are presented in Tables 12 and 13 <br /> respectively. <br /> 3.2.7. Drain Cover Fill <br /> The Squaw Gulch VLF Phase 2A Part 1 area was constructed by placing 60,632 cy of drain <br /> cover fill (DCF).The particle size distribution and Atterberg limits testing frequencies were <br /> one sample for every 20,000 cy.Three DCF samples were required to be tested for particle <br /> size and Atterberg limits.Six DCF samples were tested with passing results. DCF laboratory <br /> testing is summarized in Table 11 and individual test results are presented in Appendix <br /> 1.7. <br /> 3.3. Concrete and Cemented Rockfill Quality Assurance <br /> The CQA Monitor observed the placement of all concrete and cemented rockfill used to <br /> remediate the Squaw Gulch VLF Phase 2 underground workings. A total of 2,621 cy of concrete <br /> was used during remediation.The concrete was tested for slump,temperature, and compressive <br /> strength at a rate of one test per 50 cy. A minimum of 52 samples were required for concrete <br /> testing. A total of 55 samples were tested with results meeting the properties required by the <br /> project Technical Specifications. The concrete test results are summarized in Appendix D.4 and <br /> the individual concrete test results are presented in Appendix D.5. No testing was required for <br /> P:\Projects\0106.032 VLF2 Phase 2 CQA\J-REPORTS\Cert Report-Phase 2A Part 1\DRMS Comments\475.0106.032 CCV PHASE 2A Part 1 <br /> ROC REPORT_Revl.docx <br /> Page 12 <br />