Laserfiche WebLink
,` 4COLORADO LEGACY LAND <br /> EC iCAL ION#28,COMMENT AND RESPONSES <br /> COMMENT NC ", RESPONSE TO COMMENT <br /> The operator revised Sheet 1 to include the approved permit The requested revision has been made. <br /> boundary,as requested.However,the operator stated this could not <br /> be done on Sheet 3 because the area shown on this figure is within <br /> 1 the permit boundary,which is not shown at this scale.On the revised <br /> Sheet 1,the permit boundary clearly follows the outside edge of the <br /> NWRP,the area of which is shown in closer detail on Sheet3. <br /> Therefore,please revise Sheet 3 to show the portion of the permit <br /> bounda as it exists in the area shown on this figure. <br /> Please be sure that all exhibits/maps submitted conform to the <br /> criteria required by Rule 6.2.1(2): <br /> a. Show name of Applicant; a) The requested revision has been made. <br /> b. Must be prepared and signed by a registered land surveyor, b) The requested revision has been made. <br /> professional engineer,or other qualified person; <br /> c. Give date prepared; c) The requested revision has been made. <br /> d. Identify and outline the area that corresponds with the d) Sheet 1 and Sheet 3 show the location of the approved permit <br /> 2 application; boundary. <br /> e. With the exception of the map of the affected lands required e) The requested revision has been made. <br /> in Section 34-32-112(3)(e),C.R.S.1984,as amended,shall be <br /> prepared at a scale that is appropriate to clearly show all <br /> elements that are required to be delineated by the Act and <br /> these Rules.The acceptable range of map scales shall not be <br /> larger than 1 inch=50 feet nor smaller than 1 inch=660 <br /> feet.Also,that a map scale,appropriate legend,map title, <br /> date,and a north arrow shall be included. <br /> Letter-Drainage Design. <br /> The response indicates runoff draining to the contact between The design has been revised from a pipeline to a ditch. <br /> the NWRP and native slope directly upgradient of the NWRP will <br /> flow down the access road as it has done"historically'.The proposed The ditch is designed to convey the 67.7 cfs from above the NWRP <br /> 3 pipeline will require this area be significantly disturbed for the pipe plus the 11.4 cfs from the 4.1 acres which drain to the existing <br /> installation,including proposed fill in some areas.What hydrologic access road. Where the runoff from the 4.1 acres flows laterally <br /> and hydraulic analyses,and rehabilitation/restoration design for the into the ditch,the ditch will be equipped with an edge protection <br /> access road channel have been done to ensure the access road will consisting of 30-mil HDPE fabric. <br /> continue to perform as it has and not subject the proposed pipeline <br /> and NWRP environmental protection facility(EPF)to potentially <br /> damaging scour and erosion?The Division requires a designed <br /> PAGE 2OF10 <br />