Laserfiche WebLink
' July 2019 18107649 <br /> Table 10: Hydraulic Testing Results Summary <br /> MonitoringHydraulic Hydraulic <br /> Test Method Conductivity Conductivity <br /> ' Well cm/sec ft/da <br /> MW-1 Slug (rising head) 9.2 x 10-' 2.6 x 10-3 <br /> MW-2 Slug (rising head) 4.9 x 10-1' 1.4 x 10' <br /> ' MW-3 Slug (rising head) 7.1 x 10-' 2.0 x 10' <br /> MW-4 Slug (rising and falling head) 5.0 x 10-' 1.4 x 10' <br /> MW-5 zi Slug (rising and falling head) See notes See notes <br /> ' MW-6 3/ None N/A N/A <br /> Wireline Packer from 55-61 feet 2.3 x 10' 6.5 x 10-3 <br /> MW-7 Wireline Packer from 251-271 feet 2.9 x 10-6 8.3 x 10' <br /> Wireline Packer from 261-271 feet 4.0 x 10-6 1.1 x 10, <br /> Notes <br /> 1/MW-2 was estimated because water levels recovered to higher levels than"static"at the beginning of the <br /> ' test(Secor 1998) <br /> 2/Recovery too rapid and water displacements too small in slug tests conducted in monitoring well MW-5 for <br /> analysis <br /> 3/Recovery too slow to conduct meaningful slug test in MW-6;depth to water exceeded commonly available <br /> ' pressure transducer cable lengths. <br /> N/A.Not Available. <br /> GOLDER 1 <br />