My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-07-10_PERMIT FILE - C2009087
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2009087
>
2019-07-10_PERMIT FILE - C2009087
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2019 6:46:22 AM
Creation date
7/17/2019 12:36:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2009087
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/10/2019
Doc Name
Vegetation Information
Section_Exhibit Name
2.04.10 Vegetation Information
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 - PERMITS <br />Quantitative Sampling Procedures <br />• Quantitative sampling (cover and production data) was conducted at randomly selected sites within <br />the aforementioned vegetation types and the corresponding vegetation reference areas (Tables <br />2.04.10-T3 and 2.04.1044). Random map points for sampling locations were generated using ESRI <br />ArcMap 9.3 software and Hawth's Analysis Tools for ArcGIS (Beyer 2004). These sample points <br />were located in the field using topographic maps and Garmin III GPS units with accuracy to 10 <br />meters. The sample point locations are illustrated on maps included in the ESCO report in Exhibit <br />2.0410-E1, Vegetation Information. Cover transects were randomly oriented; production samples <br />were located randomly behind the transect origin. At each cover sampling location, the slope, <br />expressed as a percent, and aspect of the site (uncorrected for magnetic declination) were <br />determined and recorded, as was the orientation of the transect. <br />Grazing exclosures were not used in the sampling of standing crop biomass as commencement of <br />study occurred after cages would have needed to be placed. It was possible in many cases to locate <br />clip plots in small, peripheral areas protected by fences. This was a trade-off between full random <br />statistical design and the need to obtain data reflective of true standing crop. No significant effects <br />of grazing were observed within any portion of the permit area. <br />Cover Sampling Procedures <br />Cover data were collected along 50 meter (m) transects using a point -intercept method in which <br />data were recorded at interceptions of a point (referred to as a "hit") with plant species, litter, <br />standing dead plant material, soil, or rock. Plant material produced during 2008 and still standing <br />was recorded by species. Standing dead was any dead plant material that was produced in previous <br />• years but which was still standing and had not lodged or broken off to become litter. Litter was <br />considered to be any organic material that had fallen, or had begun to fall to the soil surface. <br />Inorganic materials greater than one centimeter (cm) in diameter were considered rock. The cover <br />sampling points were optically projected using a Cover -Point Optical Point Projection Device <br />developed by ESCO. The 50 m transects were randomly located and oriented in the reclaimed and <br />reference areas. One hundred points were collected along each transect (50 points on each transect <br />side). The sampling area along each transect side was one meter in width. A pair of points was <br />collected every meter with points sampled on opposite sides of each 50 m transect at a distance of <br />0.5 m from the transect (100 total points per transect). <br />To enhance understanding of collected data, all data and summary tables are organized by <br />vegetation life form. Life form categories used here reflect both plant growth habit and provenance <br />(place of origin). Categories observed in 2008 were native annual .and biennial forbs, introduced <br />annual and biennial forbs, introduced annual grasses, native perennial forbs, introduced perennial <br />forbs, native perennial grasses and graminoids, introduced perennial grasses, native shrubs, native <br />trees, ferns (and fern allies), lichens, and bryophytes (mosses). <br />First hit interceptions were used to calculate absolute top layer foliar cover (COVER column in data <br />tables in Exhibit 2.04.10-E1, Vegetation Information) by dividing the number of interceptions for a <br />particular species or ground cover type by the total number of points taken (100) per transect. First <br />hit relative vegetation cover was calculated by dividing first hit absolute cover for each species by <br />the total first hit vegetation cover. All -layer absolute cover (COVER -ALL column in data tables in <br />• Exhibit 2.04.10-E1, Vegetation Information) was calculated by dividing all hits (first -hits and <br />additional -hits) for a particular species by the total number of points taken (100) along each <br />PSCM Permit App. 2.04-142 6/15/09 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.