My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-07-09_REVISION - M2004044 (35)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2004044
>
2019-07-09_REVISION - M2004044 (35)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2025 2:06:47 AM
Creation date
7/9/2019 3:03:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/9/2019
Doc Name Note
Paer 2 of 4 (pgs 125-214 of 335)
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Aggregate Industries
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
JLE
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Great Plains Region <br /> ProjecUSite. Tucson South Mine City/County: Brighton/Adams Sampling Date. 07/07/2017 <br /> Applicant/Owner. Aggregate Industries State. CO Sampling Point. TM-A22-UPO <br /> Investigator(s): C. Ansari, J. Heule Section,Township, Range: 1, TO1S, R67W <br /> Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): hillSlope Local relief(concave,convex, none). slope Slope(%). 5 <br /> Subregion(LRR): Western Great Plains (G) Lat. 39.990252 Long: -104.845608 Datum- WGS 84 <br /> Soil Map Unit Name: Ulm loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A <br /> Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) <br /> Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No <br /> Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) <br /> SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc. <br /> Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area <br /> Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X <br /> within a Wetland? Yes No X <br /> Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X <br /> Remarks-Upland plot paired with TM-A22-WT <br /> VEGETATION —Use scientific names of plants. <br /> Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: <br /> Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species <br /> 1. None That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC <br /> 2 (excluding FAC-)- 0 (A) <br /> 3. Total Number of Dominant <br /> 4 Species Across All Strata 2 (B) <br /> 0 =Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species <br /> Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC 0 (A/B) <br /> 1 None <br /> 2 Prevalence Index worksheet: <br /> 3 Total%Cover of: Multiply by. <br /> 4 OBL species x 1 = <br /> 5 FACW species x 2= <br /> 0 =Total Cover FAC species x 3= <br /> Herb Stratum (Plot size, 5' ) FACU species x 4= <br /> 1. Bromus inermus 40 Y UPL UPL species x 5= <br /> 2. Convolvulus arvensis 20 Y UPL Column Totals. (A) (B) <br /> 3. Onopordum acanthium 15 N UPL <br /> 4 Rumex crispus 10 N FAC Prevalence Index =B/A= <br /> 5 Leymus cinereus 5 N UPL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: <br /> s. Eremopyrum triticeum 10 N NL — <br /> 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation <br /> 2-Dominance Test is>50% <br /> 7 — <br /> 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0' <br /> 8 — <br /> g _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting <br /> data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) <br /> 10 _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) <br /> 100 =Total Cover <br /> Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size. 30' ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must <br /> 1 None be present, unless disturbed or problematic <br /> 2. Hydrophytic <br /> 0 =Total Cover Vegetation <br /> %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0 Present? Yes No X <br /> Remarks <br /> US Army Corps of Engineers Great Plains-Version 2.0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.