Laserfiche WebLink
Dan Mathes <br /> June 28, 2019 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> in accordance with the letter dated April 30, 2010 from the Colorado Division of <br /> Reclamation, Mining, and Safety ("DRMS"), all sand and gravel mining operators must <br /> comply with the requirements of the Colorado Reclamation Act and the Mineral Rules and <br /> Regulations for the protection of water resources. The April 30, 2010 letter from DRMS <br /> requires that you provide information to DRMS to demonstrate you can replace long term <br /> injurious stream depletions that result from mining related exposure of ground water. <br /> According to the renewal request, the long term plan for the site is to construct reservoir <br /> liners adequate to prevent the infiltration of tributary ground water. According to the <br /> submitted materials, the reclamation of the pit into a slurry wall lined reservoir has been <br /> completed, and tests are being conducted to certify the lining. According to the 112c <br /> Annual Report received by DBMS on June 15, 2018 (available from the DRMS website at <br /> the following link: <br /> i1t p://dDpinaeing/drmsimagin/0/edoc/1252042/M2000041 18%20Jun%2021 _Minerals%20 <br /> Annual%20Reoort.pdf?searchid=a8285253-3Oa3-4303-8039-dOccac536746) <br /> Fremont Paving currently holds a bond in the amount of $3,274,361.00 for reclamation at <br /> the site. <br /> DEPLETIONS <br /> Well permit no. 54064-F (WDID 1406561) was obtained to expose water in this pit. <br /> Depletions under this plan consist of evaporation from 3.5 acres of exposed groundwater <br /> within Phase I-Parcel 4 of the mine site. The total of 3.5 acres of exposed groundwater <br /> will result in evaporative losses of 12.08 acre-feet (see attached Table 1) under this SWSP. <br /> A Glover analysis was used to create unit response function ("URF") in order to determine <br /> the lagged depletions to the Arkansas River using the following parameters: <br /> • Transmissivity- 100,000 gallons/day/foot <br /> • Storage Coefficient- 0.20 <br /> • Distance to the Stream - 2,090 feet <br /> • Distance to No-Flow Boundary- 5,460 feet <br /> The resulting URF shown below was calculated by wrapping the last 5% of depletions into <br /> the first 16 months. <br /> Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 <br /> Fraction of 0.15 0.25 0.13 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 <br /> Pumping 0 2 8 6 9 5 8 1 3 9 4 1 <br /> Month 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 <br /> Fraction of 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 <br /> Pumping 7 4 2 1 <br /> Based on the lagging described above and as shown in Tables 1-4, attached, lagged stream <br /> depletions occurring during this SWSP plan year were determined to total 12.08 acre-feet. <br />