My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-06-28_REVISION - M1977004 (9)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977004
>
2019-06-28_REVISION - M1977004 (9)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2025 7:35:53 AM
Creation date
7/1/2019 2:03:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977004
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/28/2019
Doc Name
Request For Amendment To Permit
From
Homestake Mining
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
DMC
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Homestake Mining Company May 10,2019 <br /> Regular(112d)Operation Reclamation Permit Application Package <br /> equilibrium is reached. A westward slope creep should be expected to continue <br /> until sufficient resistance is reached. <br /> • AAI (2000a) constructed a geotechnical model based on surface survey and inclinometer <br /> data to evaluate wedge failure conditions on the South Wall of the North Pit. The analysis <br /> was performed using XSTABL, a two-dimensional, limiting equilibrium slope stability <br /> software program. Results showed a relatively shallow failure plane and slope stability <br /> that are near limiting equilibrium, suggesting that only minor changes in conditions may <br /> be needed to trigger slope movement. This analysis was originally performed in 1998, but <br /> the final report was issued in 2000 (AAI, 2000a). As a result of this analysis, Inclinometers <br /> 198-1 and 198-2 were installed on the South Wall of the North Pit in November of 1998. <br /> Slope movement in the North Pit continued after regrading activities and stability assessments <br /> were completed. HMC therefore adopted an observational approach discussed in Section 4.2. <br /> 3.4.1.2. South Pit <br /> Slope movement at the South Pit began after excavation of the pit was initiated (AAI, 1999). <br /> Details regarding the date when slope movement was first observed, size, and characteristics of <br /> the movement are not included in the reporting reviewed, but tension cracks and scarps above <br /> the South Pit's East Wall were mapped in 1994, apparently as part of the Golder(1995) study as <br /> cited by Agapito (1999). The tension cracks and scarps are shown in maps by AAI (1999) and <br /> SRK (2007). The South Pit slopes were regraded in 1996 as part of mitigation effort to stabilize <br /> the pit slopes. Although AAI (1999) suggests that the regrading effort appeared to stabilize the <br /> slopes, at least one area of slope failure has become active(Figure 3-16). The landslide measures <br /> up to approximately 180 ft wide and approximately 250 ft long and annual survey data shows that <br /> his has been actively moving since at least 2006 (SRK, 2007). <br /> Previous slope stability models include: <br /> • SRK (1983) evaluated slope stability for the South Pit prior to its excavation, and the rock <br /> dumps. <br /> • DPI (1993) evaluated rotational failure for the South Pit and concluded that the pit slopes <br /> can be stabilized for Mine reclamation through backfilling, regrading, and revegetation. <br /> Pit slope movement in the South Pit temporarily ceased upon backfilling in in 1996, but shallow <br /> slope movement began in 2006 (SRK, 2007). HMC adopted an observational approach, as <br /> discussed in Section 4.2. <br /> 3.4.1.3. Tie Camp Rock Dump and Indian Rock Dump <br /> In 1995 multiple shallow slope failures occurred on the faces of both the TCRD and IRD <br /> (Figure 3-15) (Golder, 1996a). <br /> Two areas of slope movement are mapped on the face of the TCRD (Golder ,1 996a). The source <br /> of the slope failure is thought to be caused by saturation of the slope due to water that had <br /> bypassed the underdrain system. <br /> EXHIBIT E-RULE 6.4.5(AMENDED RECLAMATION PLAN) Page 42 <br /> HOMESTAKE MINING COMPANY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.