Laserfiche WebLink
Homestake Mining Company May 10,2019 <br /> Regular(112d)Operation Reclamation Permit Application Package <br /> (SRK) (1983); DPI (1993); Golder (1996a); Golder (1996b); and AAI (2000b). A summary of the <br /> slope stability is presented below in the following sections. <br /> 3.4.1.1. North Pit <br /> The highest concentration of significant slope failures at the Mine have occurred at the North Pit. <br /> Observations of significant failure features began in August 1979 when tension cracks and scarps <br /> began to develop 500 ft back from (east of)the crest of the East Wall of the North Pit(PAH, 1980). <br /> By comparison to all other significant landslides in the North Pit, the 1980 East Wall Slope Failure <br /> was a relatively small event. It occurred at the 10,500 ft level and measured approximately 200 to <br /> 250 ft wide and experienced approximately 30 ft of vertical displacement at the headscarp <br /> (AAI, 1999). <br /> Most major slope failures occurred in 1983 during an abnormally wet year attributed to an El Nino <br /> weather cycle(AAI, 1999). The relatively high levels of precipitation and rapid snow melt attributed <br /> to increased levels of pore water pressure, leading to slope instability (AAI, 1999). Major slope <br /> failure events within the North Pit in 1983 included the Northwest Corner failure, South Wall <br /> failure, two failures of the Northeast Corner, and development and slope movement along the <br /> prominent East Wall headscarp and tension crack system. <br /> Partial backfilling and slope regrading in the North Pit have made most major slope failure features <br /> indistinguishable on the landscape; However, the East Wall headscarp and tension crack system <br /> remains prominent. These features formed in March and October 1983 during major slope failure <br /> events, and minor slope movement continued into the early 1990's (EAI, 2014). The surface <br /> expression of the East Wall main scarp area is characterized by zone of open cracks, voids, tilted <br /> trees, and both uphill and downhill facing scarps. Up to about 120 ft of vertical displacement has <br /> been measured across the center of the main scarp, and movement diminishes to the north and <br /> south. <br /> Since the major events of 1983 and the development of the East Wall main scarp, other slope <br /> failure events have occurred. These include the development of tension cracks and scarps on the <br /> South Wall in 1996 (AAI, 1999; AAI, 2000a) and smaller scale slope movement within the east <br /> wall of the North Pit such as the 2015 "sluff' of the east wall (HMC, 2016). <br /> Previous slope stability models include: <br /> • CNI (1983) evaluated slope stability of the East Wall using a three-block geologic model <br /> and large rotational failure extending from the East Wall main scarp to the base of the <br /> North Pit. CNI (1983) concluded that equilibrium will be reached within 10 years if no <br /> backfill is placed in the pit and within 5 years of backfill is emplaced. The headwall scarp <br /> will continue to slough to the angle of repose, and that it is possible that the East Wall <br /> overlies a pre-existing landslide. CNI (1983) does not report a specific angle of repose. <br /> • DPI (1993) evaluated four configurations of rotational failure for the North Pit and <br /> concluded that stabilization of the pit slopes can be stabilized for Mine reclamation through <br /> backfilling, regrading, and revegetation. <br /> EXHIBIT E-RULE 6.4.5(AMENDED RECLAMATION PLAN) Page 40 <br /> HOMESTAKE MINING COMPANY <br />