Laserfiche WebLink
Case No. 09CW105 <br /> Findings of Fact,Conclusions of Law, <br /> Judgment and Decree <br /> Page 27 of 28 <br /> 61. The application for water rights confirmed above for the Walters Reservoir No. 1, <br /> Walters Reservoir No. 2, and Bokelman Reservoir No. l was filed in the year 2009, and <br /> the amended application for water rights confirmed above for the Walters Pits and Green <br /> and Croissant Pits was filed in the year 2010. The priority dates awarded shall establish <br /> their relative priorities among other water rights or conditional water rights awarded on <br /> applications filed in 2009 for the Walters Reservoir No. 1, Walters Reservoir No. 2, and <br /> Bokelman Reservoir No. 1 and 2010 for the Walters Pits and Green and Croissant Pits; but <br /> such water rights shall be junior to all water rights or conditional water rights awarded on <br /> applications filed in any previous calendar year. <br /> 62. The conditional water rights decreed herein are continued in force through the <br /> month of October, 2017. An application for a finding of reasonable diligence or to make <br /> absolute shall be filed pursuant to CRS§37-92-302 no later than October 31,2017. <br /> 63. Retained Jurisdiction: <br /> 63.1 Pursuant to CRS §37-92-304(6), the approval of the above plan for <br /> augmentation is subject to reconsideration by the water judge on the question of injury to <br /> the vested rights of others for a period of 5 years after the date that two Hillsborough <br /> Shares are first put to a Changed Use. <br /> 63.2 Pursuant to CRS §37-92-304(6), approval of the above change of water <br /> rights shall be subject to reconsideration by the water judge on the question of injury to the <br /> vested rights of others for a period of five years from the date that two Hillsborough Shares <br /> are first put to a Changed Use. <br /> 63.3 The Court shall retain jurisdiction regarding the final determinations of the <br /> total exposed surface acres at the Walters and Bokelman Pits site and the Green and <br /> Croissant Pits site for the period of time set forth in Paragraph 39.2. Retained jurisdiction <br /> must be invoked pursuant to the requirements of Paragraph 39.2. <br /> 63.4 The Court shall retain jurisdiction regarding the calculation of the amount <br /> of total storage located within the void space of the unlined material at the Walters and <br /> Bokelman Pits site and plan to account for storage in the void space for the period of time <br /> set forth in Paragraph 13.5. Retained jurisdiction must be invoked pursuant to the <br /> requirements of Paragraph 13.5. <br /> 63.5 Procedure for Retained Jurisdiction. Any party, including the State and <br /> Division Engineers, may invoke retained jurisdiction pursuant to paragraphs 63.1 or 63.2 <br /> by filing a Petition to do so with this Court. Such Petition shall be filed under the caption <br /> and case number of this case and shall be served on counsel of record for all parties who <br /> have appeared. Any Petition to invoke the retained jurisdiction shall set forth with <br /> i <br /> i <br /> i <br /> a <br /> i <br /> i <br /> i <br /> a <br />