Laserfiche WebLink
NEWMONT <br /> GOLDCORP <br /> photographs (ground-based, aerial or satellite) should include the date of <br /> the image.] <br /> With the exception of Figure 1 (which does not include the date of the aerial <br /> image), none of the figures in the TR-113 submittal conform to the standard in <br /> Rule 6.2.1(2). Please resubmit Figures 2 through 4 to conform to Rule 6.2.1(2). <br /> In lieu of resubmitting Figure 1 with the date of the aerial image, please provide <br /> the date of the image in your response to this adequacy letter. <br /> Figure 1 has been updated to include the July of 2017 aerial image date; <br /> included in this response. Figures 2 through 4, updated to conform to the <br /> standard in Rule 6.2.1(2), have also been included in this response. <br /> 2) Liner: The narrative on page 1 does not provide any specifics on the liner. Please <br /> describe the material being used for the liner. This information will be critical to <br /> the analyses required in Comment 5 below. <br /> The liner used to construct the study cell is 80 millimeter double-sided <br /> textured linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) geomembrane. <br /> 3) Stacking: The "stacking" discussion on page 1 of the TR request states <br /> "Approximately 18,000 tons of ore will be placed on top of the crushed ore" <br /> discussed in the `liner"portion of the TR request. The "stacking"narrative further <br /> explains a combined 36,000 tons of test pad materials will be the total amount of <br /> material placed on the leach cell liner and be stacked a maximum of 35 feet in <br /> height above the cell liner. The "liner' narrative indicates the 3-foot depth of <br /> previously processed, crushed ore is also 18,000 tons. Despite the variable <br /> thickness (between 2 and 32 feet, averaging roughly 17 feet), this suggests the <br /> ore to be placed on the 3 feet of crushed ore has the same weight despite being <br /> about 5 times the thickness. Please explain why the ore has roughly 20 percent <br /> of the density of the previously crushed, processed ore. <br /> Upon review of the ore tonnage; the approximate weight of crushed ore on the <br /> cell is estimated to be approximately 16,000 tons at an average stacking height <br /> of less than four feet. The ore proposed to be placed on top of the <br /> aforementioned crushed ore is estimated to weigh approximately 40,000 tons <br /> at an average height of 11 feet. This is based on the average height of each <br /> portion of ore (combined total average height of 15 feet), cell area (as <br /> confirmed in the response to comment number 8, below) and unit weight of <br /> the material (as noted in the response to comment number 5, below). <br />