My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-06-17_REVISION - M2001038 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2001038
>
2019-06-17_REVISION - M2001038 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2025 7:15:00 AM
Creation date
6/18/2019 10:31:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001038
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/17/2019
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Environment, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Albert Frei and Sons, Inc. Page 5 <br /> AFS.-Bennett Pit - M-2001-038 June 17, 2019 <br /> life cycle of those species which require special consideration(e.g., elk calving, migration <br /> routes, peregrine falcon nesting, grouse strutting grounds). Please discuss the measures the <br /> operator will use the protect wildlife during the mining and reclamation operation. <br /> We believe the Mining and Reclamation Plans do take into the impacts to wildlife. Because it is a <br /> continuation of an existing operation and the wildlife are likely acclimated to the noise and human <br /> activities. So the continuation of the mine will not increase the impacts already there. The <br /> speed limits in the mine, and the mining staff is directed to be aware of wildlife that may enter <br /> the mine operating hours and what to do if they find any on the active mining area that came on <br /> after hours limit impacts. Using wildlife friendly wire fencing, instead of chainlink allows the <br /> wildlife that enter the mine a way to safely leave instead of block their way. The impacts are <br /> temporary in nature during the active mining times as the area is open enough of so any wildlife <br /> can skirt the active areas or have use of other parts of the property where no activities are <br /> taking place. The ERO Resources report discusses impacts to wildlife on the mine and to <br /> paraphrase the report, when the vegetation is removed the area will no longer be desirable to <br /> wildlife until it is reclaimed. It also noted there are no wildlife corridors or other sensitive <br /> species that occur on the site that would be affected by the project. More information is <br /> provided starting on Page 6 of the ERO report. <br /> ERO Resources made a recommendation to submit an endangered species habitat assessment to <br /> the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for concurrence with their findings, ERO to file that request <br /> on or around June 4, 2019 and once a reply is received it wiII be filed with the Division for the <br /> file. They also recommend doing a nest survey one week before disturbing any new area during <br /> the breeding season, April 1 to August 31 . AFS will follow the recommendations for not <br /> removing vegetation during that time if raptor nests are found. Records of the inspection will be <br /> kept in the Company records for inspection, if needed. <br /> The speed limit along the main access road and within the mine is limited to 10 mph to help <br /> mitigate the truck traffic entering and leaving the mine will have on the larger wildlife species. <br /> Prior to startup of daily activities the site is inspected to assure there are no wildlife in the mine <br /> that would be affected by the daily activities. Usually the larger animals that over night in the <br /> mine leave once humans enter the mine area, if this does not happen they are chased out of the <br /> active area. <br /> Rule 6.4.12, Exhibit L—Reclamation Costs <br /> 17. The cost estimate submitted with the application covers 30 acres of affected land. Based on the <br /> proposed mining plan, no phasing of the mining is planned and page 4 indicates a maximum <br /> disturbance scenario will be used to allow flexibility for the mine to be developed from both <br /> ends of the deposit. If the applicant would like to use a phased 30-acre bonding approach, please <br /> revise the mining plan to accommodate this and define the phases accordingly, or provide an <br /> estimate for the maximum disturbance scenario. <br /> That was not our intent on page 4, it was to allow for a plan that covers the existing and <br /> proposed disturbance area of 30 acres. During our review of that plan we realize that we are <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.