Laserfiche WebLink
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />time will topsoil be placed without adequate metrics in place to accurately estimate volumes placed <br />within each reclamation unit to ensure an accurate accounting of the topsoil balance. 3) Topsoil <br />will not be placed indiscriminately within reclamation units in a manner that does not serve a <br />specific defendable purpose regarding vegetation type establishment or location within the <br />reclamation unit or localized watershed. <br />In summary, application of PERA on "shrub -favorable areas" would be based on the community <br />development contributory factors of. 1) soil quantity, quality, and replacement depth; 2) aspect, <br />slope, and landform; 3) documented and expected performance of various floral species; 4) <br />revegetation metrics; and 5) the target post -mining land use. In this manner, reclamation and <br />resultant developing communities will be encouraged to follow a more natural path to maturation <br />and successional progression as opposed to more historically utilized grassland favorable <br />approaches that should only be applied to the remaining 60% to 80% of reclaimed ground (sloping <br />areas). However, there will likely be instances, if not an overall need, to incorporate managerial <br />practices to encourage or protect positive recruitment to the shrub populations. Such management <br />may include the following steps: <br />• Use of elevated quantities of sagebrush seed within the grassland target areas, and <br />placement of that seed in a manner to encourage sagebrush emergence. <br />• Use of limited livestock (cattle) grazing to select against grasses and for shrubs and <br />forbs. <br />• Use of elk -proof fencing to preclude access into large blocks of maturing shrub <br />populations, especially core areas. <br />• Use of hunting pressure to reduce elk utilization of new reclamation where it can be <br />incorporated in a safe manner given proximity to active mining. Develop special <br />seasons in concert with CPW for management of "refuge" elk. For obvious reasons, <br />any activity in this regard would have to be designed and approved for implementation <br />in accordance with applicable statutes. Furthermore, approvals from appropriate <br />agencies (CPW, MSHA, etc.) will be obtained as necessary. <br />• Use of orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata) in key reclamation locations to encourage <br />elk away from maturing shrub populations. It has been documented that this taxon is <br />heavily utilized by foraging elk. <br />• Implement procedures for micro -habitat development whereby snow catchment is <br />encouraged and shrub heavy mixes can be applied. <br />• Interseeding of shrubs (as necessary as a normal husbandry practice) within areas not <br />exhibiting satisfactory establishment of shrubs, but still presenting opportunities <br />(micro -niches) for shrubs. Such interseeding would be performed in accordance with <br />Rule 4.15.7(5)(g), and documentation of any such efforts would be provided in the <br />Rule 2 Permits 2.05-23 Revision Date: 5/25/18 <br />Revision No.: RN -07 <br />