Laserfiche WebLink
ERC UPG Site <br /> Threatened and Endangered Species Screening <br /> Primary threats to existence of this species are habitat loss due to intensive agriculture, habitat <br /> degradation and fragmentation due to control of burrowing mammals and predation by cats and dogs. <br /> • No owl individuals were observed on or surrounding the survey area.The survey area is located within <br /> the overall range of the black-tailed prairie dog; however no active colonies were observed on the <br /> Survey area.The survey area is subject to fragmentation and human disturbance limiting the potential <br /> use of the survey area by this species.The proposed project and any future land use changes within <br /> the survey area should not adversely affect the continued existence or potential habitat of this <br /> species. <br /> RIVER OTTER (LONTRA CANADENSIS) <br /> The river otter is listed as a state threatened species in Colorado. River otters vary in length from 26-42 <br /> inches, with males larger than females. Their long tapered tails make up about one-third of their length. <br /> River otters historically ranged throughout most of the United States and Canada but were extirpated <br /> from much of their range in the west. Reintroductions of otter to Colorado began in 1976, and they are <br /> now found in small numbers throughout most of western Colorado with a more scattered distribution in <br /> eastern Colorado (CPW 2019). River otters may inhabit nearly every aquatic habitat however, they are <br /> most likely to occupy beaver ponds,stream channels,and warm water sloughs exhibiting healthy riparian <br /> vegetation, woody debris,and logjams (CPW 2019). <br /> • No river otter individuals were observed on or surrounding the survey area. River otter populations <br /> are listed as known to occur in Weld County (CPW 2019). However, individuals and populations are <br /> still rare occurrences.within the front range and eastern plains. Further, preferred habitat is usually <br /> associated with beaver activity and structures which do not exist within or near the Survey area.The <br /> proposed project and any future land use changes on the survey area are not likely to adversely affect <br /> the continued existence or available habitat of the species. <br /> 8.0 SUMMARY <br /> ERC has conducted this screening for federal and state threatened, endangered and species of concern <br /> for the approximately 265-acre survey area. The following provides key items identified as part of this <br /> report: <br /> 1. Four primary vegetation communities exist within the survey area and are comprised of Cultivated <br /> Cropland, Upland Grassland Ruderal Herbaceous vegetation, Western Cattail Marsh, and Western <br /> Great Plains Riparian Woodland, Shrubland and Herbaceous vegetation (Comer et al. 2003). <br /> 2. Generally,there are features on the survey area and the surrounding area that provide general habitat <br /> for local songbirds, raptors, waterfowl, amphibians, reptiles, aquatic invertebrate and small to mid- <br /> size mammals. However, the majority of the habitat on survey area (75%) is classified as Cultivated <br /> Cropland and Upland Grassland Ruderal Herbaceous vegetation which is somewhat degraded from a <br /> wildlife perspective by historic and current land use practices. Within the survey area, the Western <br /> Great Plains Riparian Woodland, Shrubland, and Herbaceous and Western Cattail Marsh vegetation <br /> communities occupy a smaller percentage of the survey area(24%)but provides a variety of important <br /> wildlife values. <br /> 17 <br />