Laserfiche WebLink
No-Rise/No-Impact Certification <br /> September 11, 2018 <tjC <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br /> The purpose of the this No-Rise/No-Impact Certificate is to determine if the construction of the <br /> proposed trail will impact the existing floodway as denoted on the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate <br /> Maps (FIRM)that the trail transects. <br /> FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) <br /> The proposed trail transects the following FIRM maps: <br /> • 08001 CO2326H dated March 5, 2007 <br /> • 08001 CO2327H dated March 5, 2007 <br /> • 08001 CO2328H dated March 5, 2007 <br /> • 08001 CO2329H dated March 5, 2007 <br /> Analysis Procedures <br /> The following steps were undertaken to analyze the impact of the trails on the existing floodway: <br /> 1. Currently Effective Model <br /> TJC obtained the most recent step-backwater hydraulic model for the South Platte River from <br /> Urban Drainage and Flood Control District(UDFCD). The HEC-RAS model was prepared in <br /> April 2005 by CDM for the South Platte River Flood Hazard Area Delineation (FHAD) <br /> Report. Table 1 is the Floodplain and Floodway Data table from the FHAD. <br /> 2. Duplicate Effective Model <br /> HEC-RAS was used to create a duplicate effective hydraulic model for cross sections 14, 15, <br /> 16, 17, and 17.7 of the most recent step-backwater hydraulic model. Plan view of the cross <br /> sections modeled are delineated in exhibit A. <br /> The Duplicated Effective Model results are an exact match to the Currently Effective Model. <br /> Table 2 compares the results of the duplicate model against the FHAD report. Exhibit B <br /> contains the cross sections generated for the Duplicate Effective Model. <br /> 3. Existing Conditions Model <br /> HEC-RAS was utilized to revise the Duplicate Effective Model to reflect existing conditions. <br /> Twelve (12) additional cross-sections where added to the model covering the proposed new <br /> concrete trail, without the proposed trail in place. New cross sections are approximately 500' <br /> apart as shown on exhibit A. <br /> The Existing Conditions Model results varied from both the Effective and Duplicate models <br /> as denoted below. <br />