My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-05-17_REVISION - M1994117
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1994117
>
2019-05-17_REVISION - M1994117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2025 5:46:07 AM
Creation date
5/20/2019 1:02:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1994117
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/17/2019
Doc Name
Adequacy Review #3
From
Colorado Milling Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
AME
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Seepa e Failure <br /> Condition Head(ft) Pressure(psi) Pressure Gradient(psilft) Factor of Safety <br /> Operation 4.5 1.9 0.6 16.6 <br /> Current 15.2 6.6 2.2 4.5 <br /> Design 17.6 7.6 2.5 3.9 <br /> Max OP 22.1 9.6 3.2 3.1 <br /> Maximum 102.6 45 15 0.7 <br /> The limitation of the West Driefontein Mine seepage experiment and calculations is that they <br /> only consider leakage through the bulkhead, concrete-rock contact, and immediate rock mass. <br /> They do not consider seepage or piping through joints or shears parallel to the tunnel, across the <br /> plug. The Times Mine Bulkhead is located on a vein that was not pressure grouted. Under high <br /> head, this is the most likely seepage path. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> ■ The Times Mine Bulkhead is currently holding back a head of 15.2 feet of water(6.6 <br /> psi). The stated design capacity is 17.6 feet (7.6 psi). <br /> ■ The water may have been pumped into the mine in the past or groundwater may be <br /> seeping in and raising the mine pool. <br /> ■ The maximum head possible behind the bulkhead, when water overflows through the <br /> Wynona Shaft well casing, is 102.6 feet (45 psi) <br /> ■ Based on our calculations, the bulkhead should perform adequately under the design, <br /> current and proposed operational conditions. <br /> ■ Under the maximum proposed operational conditions, the bulkhead area should be <br /> observed and conditions documented on a regular basis with a particular focus on any <br /> increases in seepage or the development of any concentrated areas of flow. Should a <br /> significant flow or seepage increase be observed, the mine pool would need to be lowered <br /> rapidly. <br /> ■ Based on our calculations, the bulkhead would most likely fail under the maximum <br /> loading condition where water overflows at the Wynona Shaft. The likely failure mode <br /> would be excessive seepage and water flow past the bulkhead, possibly through the vein <br /> in the back. <br /> ■ The total volume of water stored at or above the elevation of the bulkhead is unknown. If <br /> the Wynona 100 Level is lower than the bulkhead, the additional volume from the <br /> Wynona Shaft is negligible and water behind the bulkhead is limited to the Times Mine <br /> volume of approximately 25,000 cubic feet (187,000 gallons). If the Wynona 100 Level <br /> is higher than the bulkhead, most of its unknown volume would be stored behind the <br /> bulkhead(i.e. it would drain out if the bulkhead was opened). <br /> ■ Minor seepage is visible along the contact between the bulkhead and the rock. The <br /> seepage continues 3 feet past the air side face. <br /> ■ The presence of oxidized iron precipitate on the bulkhead face, rock interface and vein <br /> suggest mine pool water is seeping around the bulkhead. This is typical. <br /> ■ Total flow past the bulkhead is negligible. No concentrated flows were observed. <br /> ■ The bulkhead appears to be performing adequately. There are no visible signs of distress. <br /> - 6 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.