Laserfiche WebLink
the ground is heavily altered, the weakest shear strength is in the concrete. Based on the rock <br /> visible directly in front of the bulkhead it appears that the altered rock was mostly removed from <br /> the perimeter. Per ACI 318, the design shear strength of concrete is twice the square root of the <br /> compressive strength. Assuming a conservative compressive strength of 2000 psi, the design <br /> shear strength is 89 psi or 12,880 psf. Multiplying the perimeter of the bulkhead face (19.4 ft) by <br /> the length of 3 ft results in an area of 58.2 sf. Multiplying that by 12,880 psf results in a design <br /> shear load capacity of 749,602 pounds. The load on the bulkhead is a function of the water <br /> pressure on the face area. With a face area of 22 sf and a maximum water pressure of 45 psi <br /> (6480 psf), the driving force is 142,560 pounds. Dividing 749,602 by 142,560 gives a factor of <br /> safety of 5.3. Hence, shear is not a likely failure mode under any loading condition. <br /> Structural failure occurs when the concrete plug itself fails due to deep beam bending or shear <br /> failure through the reinforced concrete due to water pressure or earthquake induced water <br /> hammer. It can be avoided by making the bulkhead long enough and adding rebar reinforcement <br /> at both faces. <br /> The Times Mine Bulkhead structural strength can be calculated per ACI 318 deep beam analysis, <br /> as described in Abel 1998. This analysis compares the tensile bending stresses on air side face to <br /> the allowable concrete tensile strength. The rather involved calculations were done on a <br /> spreadsheet and the results are summarized below. For the proposed operational, current, design, <br /> and maximum operational conditions, a three-foot-thick unreinforced concrete bulkhead is <br /> acceptable. For the maximum load condition, rebar consisting of at least number 5 bars 12 inches <br /> on center each way would be required. Based on statements by CMC, rebar was used in the <br /> construction but the size and spacing are not known (no documentation available). Based on this, <br /> a structural failure is unlikely yet possible. Please note that these calculations do not take <br /> earthquake loading or water hammer effects into account. Should those be requested, D&A will <br /> have to research appropriate earthquake loads for the site. <br /> Structural Failure <br /> Condition Head(ft) Bulkhead Minimum Required Factor of Safety <br /> Length ft Bulkhead Length ft <br /> Operation 4.5 3 0.9 3.3 <br /> Current 15.2 3 1.6 1.9 <br /> Design 17.6 3 1.7 1.8 <br /> Max Op 22.1 3 2.0 1.5 <br /> Maximum 102.6 3 4.2 0.7 <br /> Concrete degradation occurs when the acidic mine waters chemically break down the concrete. <br /> It can be avoided by using sulfate resistant cement (ASTM C-150 Type V), pozzolans like flyash <br /> and microsilica, and possibly permeability reducing admixtures in the mix. It is also common to <br /> place lime in the tunnel upstream of the bulkhead to neutralize the acidic mine waters in the <br /> vicinity of the bulkhead. This technique is effective in the short term but may provide only <br /> limited beneficial use in the long term. <br /> For the Times Mine Bulkhead, there is no information on the concrete mix design used. Hence, <br /> one must assume that it contained standard Type-I cement. The quality of the water behind the <br /> -4 - <br />