My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-05-17_REVISION - M1994117
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1994117
>
2019-05-17_REVISION - M1994117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2025 5:46:07 AM
Creation date
5/20/2019 1:02:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1994117
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/17/2019
Doc Name
Adequacy Review #3
From
Colorado Milling Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
AME
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECEIVED <br /> COLORADO MILLING COMPANY, LLC <br /> P.O. Box 1523 MAY 17 2019 <br /> Longmont, Colorado 80502 <br /> DMSION OF RECLAMATION <br /> MINING AND SAFETY <br /> Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety May 16, 2019 <br /> Amy Eschberger <br /> Environmental Protection Specialista�s // <br /> 1313 Sherman Street—Room 215 <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> RE: Gold Hill Mill, Permit No. M-1994-117,Amendment Application <br /> (Revision No. AM-01),Adequacy Review No.3 <br /> Attention: Amy Eschberger: <br /> This is the Colorado Milling Company, LLC's Response Letter to the Amy Eschberger's January <br /> 14, 2019 Adequacy Review No. 3 of the Application for an Amendment to the Gold Hill Mill <br /> Limited Impact 110 (2) Permit No. M-1994-117, to formally add the previously permitted Left <br /> Hand Creek Pump Station, Gold Hill Mill Pipeline, and the Times Mine adit portal to the affected <br /> land boundary of the Gold Hill Mill Permit. These three features are collectively referred to as the <br /> Gold Hill Mill Waterline in this Response Letter. In order to ensure that the responses to the <br /> Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety's request for additional information and clarification <br /> can be properly reviewed, the responses are set out below each of Amy Eschberger's Adequacy <br /> Review comments. <br /> Exhibit C — Mining Plan (Rule 6.3.3): <br /> 1)The operator's response to item no. 8 states the footbridge will no longer be installed, and that <br /> a field survey has disclosed a gap between the Mammoth MS No. 17576 and the Paris MS No. <br /> 5149A that will provide access to the pump station from Lickskillet Road. This open area is <br /> located entirely on the Gold Gulch unpatented lode mining claim owned by the operator. Please <br /> describe this new proposed access to the pump station. Is there an existing trail/road in this area? <br /> If so, will it need to be improved and/or widened for access by the operation? Will any <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.