My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-04-16_REVISION - C1981019 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2019-04-16_REVISION - C1981019 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2019 12:06:52 PM
Creation date
4/22/2019 11:13:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/16/2019
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
MR200
Email Name
ZTT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 4 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS <br /> <br />Rule 4 Performance Standards 4-70 Revision Date: 4/16/19 <br /> Revision No.: MR-200 <br />Woody Plant Density – Post-2008 Revegetation <br />As alluded to under the cover and production success criteria, a new revegetation plan utilizing a <br />“prescribed ecological reclamation approach” (PERA) has been adopted for the Colowyo <br />operation that will facilitate the creation of wildlife habitat conducive vegetation communities <br />(sagebrush steppe), hence Post-2008 revegetation will be subject to a different set of success <br />criteria for bond release. In this regard, the following discussion lays some of the foundation of <br />the underlying principles of this approach to provide a basis for development of the success <br />standards. <br /> <br />The post-2008 revegetation will specifically target livestock grazing and sage grouse brood rearing <br />habitat. Both of these, in combination, are the two primary components of the Post-mining <br />Rangeland Land Use. Post-2008 areas designed to target livestock grazing (and incidental / <br />unavoidable grazing by elk) will comprise approximately 60% to 80% of the original and South <br />Taylor reclaimed landscapes. These areas will principally occupy more steeply sloping ground <br />(>10%) where the grassland community is necessary to preclude excessive erosion, especially <br />from snowmelt. Based on evaluation of the post-mining topography, the remaining 20% to 40% <br />(estimated) of the reclaimed landscape will afford flat or gently sloping surfaces (<10%) with <br />reduced exposure to erosion. It is on these less exposed more gentle slopes whereby development <br />of wildlife conducive habitats (sagebrush steppe) can be attempted (only on larger blocks of land <br />- e.g., >5 acres) without overly compromising stability. In this regard, sagebrush communities <br />targeting sage grouse brood-rearing habitat will be attempted in earnest on approximately 20% (or <br />more) of the Post-2008 reclaimed landscape, with the goal of achieving success on at least one- <br />half of this acreage or as otherwise agreed upon between Colowyo and CDRMS. <br /> <br />The principal basis of PERA is to rebuild the foundation conditions of target vegetation <br />communities taking into account the appropriate aspects, slopes, and topographic features of the <br />reclaimed landscape. In this manner, targeted communities, as opposed to more simple grasslands <br />will be more strongly encouraged. Potential reclamation techniques to be applied to facilitate the <br />targeting of sagebrush communities include, but are not limited to: 1) taking advantage of site- <br />specific opportunities for development of convex and concave surfaces to encourage snow <br />entrapment; 2) development of small berms along the contour and somewhat perpendicular to <br />prevailing winds, also to encourage snow entrapment; 3) use of native species; 4) severe reduction <br />of grasses in the seed mix; 5) use of only bunch grasses for those taxa planted with sagebrush; 6) <br />sharp increases in the amount of sagebrush seed to be used; 7) extra care to obtain the correct <br />subspecies of sagebrush (vaseyana-pauciflora) with a seed source as close as possible to the Axial <br />Basin; 8) extra care to place seed at the ideal time of year (immediately prior to the first major <br />snowfall event; 9) placement of thin layers of topsoil over overburden; 10) possible placement of <br />zero topsoil; 11) possible placement of thin layers of overburden over topsoil; 12) use of <br />specialized seed placement equipment to obtain correct planting depths; 13) use of seedbed <br />preparation equipment and techniques to encourage sagebrush emergence; and 14) interseeding of <br />additional grasses and/or forbs (only where necessary) following a period of 2 – 3 years of growth <br />by shrubs. All of these possible techniques / metrics are designed to diminish the competitive <br />advantage of grasses, at least in the early stages of establishment and growth. The primary <br />“foundation-building” element for this approach is the ability to replace variable topsoil depths <br />and/or quality of soil materials depending on site-specific needs, the discretion of the field <br />construction supervisor, and the capabilities (or lack thereof) of available materials and equipment.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.