Laserfiche WebLink
A B C D E F <br /> o 0 00 0 0 <br /> o o 0 <br /> w w w ro m <br /> w w w <br /> N LINE TABLE <br /> Um <br /> _ N LINE LENGTH BEARING CURVE TABLE uRs Center <br /> 8151 <br /> L1 777.34 N22°03'57"W env CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA TANGENT CHORD East Tufts Avenue <br /> Denver, Co. 80237-2637 <br /> 1 1 303 694-2770 (phone) <br /> 3 L2 807.18 N44°15'02"E C1 178.41 300.00 34`04'27" 91.93 175.79 303-694-3946 (foz) <br /> L3 2845.31 N78°19'29"E C2 154.16 250.00 35'19'51" 79.62 151.73 PROPOSED BENCHMARK o k UTILITY LOCATE(POWER) <br /> 10 T o. <br /> L4 184.19 S66°20'28"E <br /> N 32,000 /- - a v <br /> A0 PROPOSED <br /> 44+p0 x p CONTRACTOR / ©p,l/Aglt NgLYBDENUM COMPANY <br /> TUNNELSTAGE 1 q0+00 4a+00 /r C2 44 4g 4j STAGING AREA / <br /> PROPOSEDBENCHMARK +00 �,388+000��1a�� — _ _�—� %I <br /> 34+00 36•�� �— EXISTING PUMP / I <br /> 0 32+ rw'r� i��/% HOUSE <br /> w 28+ / � i j / f POTENTIAL GAS <br /> p 2 r CONNECTION LOCATION <br /> SEE TUNNEL 2 9d ° +00 <br /> / OUTLET PORTAL / <br /> TRANSITION DETAIL 1 S +00 20+00 <br /> C-17 <br /> 1 <br /> 2 GA --- — �� o TEMPORARYSPOIL/MUCK <br /> STROAGE LOCATION �I` / / 2 <br /> EXISTING WEST INTERCEPTOR oo = o— �� EXISTING (APPROX.LOCATION) <br /> CONDUIT AND ACCESS ROAD ti �� _ __ _ ri��' \�\ CLEAR POND / <br /> / / MAYFLOWER FLOOD <br /> N 31,000 STAGE 2 END STA.10+11 ^� \` — %\�j! \\ �,t�✓/tom EXISTING SUBSTATION N 3 t,OCD �� TUNNEL SYSTEM <br /> STAGE 3 END STA.10+84 0• \ / '/ / DRYS PERMIT SET <br /> ACCESS ROAD ALIGNMENT FOR STAGE 3 <br /> CONCEPTUAL TUNNEL <br /> STAGE 2 / <br /> CONCEPTUAL TUNNEL STAGE 3 1 1 11� <br /> z CONCEPTUAL <br /> TUNNELSTAGE3 0/ <br /> PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION <br /> STAGE 1 ACCESS ROAD ALIGNMENT \ <br /> o \ \ �6L <br /> 3 CONCEPTUAL $ / \ \ �` ��♦ /• ✓/ 3 <br /> a TUNNEL STAGE 41 j` <br /> SIDE H + \ �\ 1 o o <br /> Oo INT NO.1 / PROPOSED , �> \ /l I! _ /j ,�✓ <br /> i N 30,000 Op� i� CONTRACTOR ;\ }� �! �� \ !/ �I� �/% - / N 30,000 <br /> N x STAGING AREA <br /> ACCESS ROAD 1 + <br /> ALIGNMENT FOR o+t oo INLET PORTAL NO.1 <br /> STAGE a <br /> � + x o 0 � �\ \ � ;PA <br /> � \ � /,/- / ISSUED FOR BIDDING <br /> \ nac m <br /> i o INLET <br /> o PORTAL PROPOSED BENCHMARK <br /> ! —/• / ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION <br /> N0.3 <br /> INLET PORTAL \ \ <br /> / SPOIL/MUCK DISPOSAL \\ !• j Z ! <br /> NO.a LEGEND: <br /> INLET PORTAL AREA(APPROX.LOCATION) `� %� %p � \ \ \1, <br /> > /SPOIL/MUCK 2 REVISIONS <br /> NO. \ I \ > \ <br /> DISPOSAL AREA \\ <� \ \ PROPOSED BENCHMARK j ® STAGING AREA NO. DESCRIPTION DATE <br /> ACCESS ROAD \ \\ 1a <br /> AA <br /> of PROPOSED ALIGNMENT FOR \` S2 ` \` / I / 4 <br /> y 4 BENCHMARK STAGES 1 AND 2 / 1 SPOIL/MUCK DISPOSAL AREA 0 <br /> ` \ \\ / %I� I REGRADING OF DAM FACE Q <br /> o N 29,000 <br /> TUNNEL ALIGNMENT STAGE 1 <br /> �O / \ APPROXIMATE POWDER <br /> N :y REGRADING OF DAM FACE 1 // \\ �� /�1 // \\ MAGAZINE LOCATION FOR / CONCEPTUAL TUNNEL ALIGNMENT <br /> 0 2012-2013(BY OTHERS) 1 b // \ �y�i TUNNELING CONTRACTOR f uRs PROJECT N0: 22242752.00100 <br /> \ STAGES 2 AND 3 DRAWN BY: wDH <br /> �/� \ \\\•, ��� `\ Ji��rim 111 ,\ t CONCEPTUAL TUNNEL STAGE 4 DESIGNED BY: D� <br /> y/ CHECKED BY: <br /> ANTICIPATED ACCESS ROADS DATE CREATED. 3/2012 <br /> DURING CONSTRUCTION PLOT DATE: 3/2012 <br /> SCALE: AS SHOWN <br /> APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS <br /> OF PROPOSED SURVEY ACAD vER: 2011 <br /> IBENCHMARKS/CONTROL SHEET TITLE <br /> PROPOSED <br /> ALIGNMENTS AND <br /> PLAN VIEW STAGING AREAS <br /> 0 250 500 750 PRELIMINARY <br /> SCALE IN FEET NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C-02 <br /> A B C I D E I F SHEET 4 OF 8 <br />