Laserfiche WebLink
law indicates that unless sand and gravel are specifically cited in the reservation,they are not <br /> deemed part of the mineral interest but part of the surface ownership. I am attaching two <br /> references. One is taken from Kinnie v. Keith (Colorado 128 P.3d 297 (2005)). The second is an <br /> article entitled Now Is It a Mineral? The Supreme Court Takes Another Look at Sand and <br /> Gravel. It cites a number of cases but makes a determination on sand and gravel in its <br /> conclusion. <br /> Based on these determinations, sand and gravel are part of the surface ownership since they <br /> were not specifically cited in your reservation. <br /> Sincerely, on behalf of Mr. Rick Ensminger, <br /> J <br /> Randy Schafer <br /> Consultant <br /> cc: Rick Ensminger <br /> Attachments: Excerpts from Kinnie v. Keith <br /> Conclusion from Now Is It a Mineral?The Supreme Court Takes Another Look at <br /> Sand and Gravel <br />