Laserfiche WebLink
' March 2019 18107649 <br /> ' Table 9: Hydraulic Testing Results Summary <br /> ' Monitoring Hydraulic Hydraulic <br /> Well Test Method Conductivity Conductivity <br /> cm/sec ftlda <br /> ' MW-1 Slug (rising head) 9.2 x 10-7 2.6 x 10-3 <br /> MW-2 1� Slug (rising head) 4.9 x 10-10 1.4 x 10-6 <br /> MW-3 Slug (rising head) 7.1 x 10-9 2.0 x 10-5 <br /> ' MW-4 Slug (rising and falling head) 5.0 x 10-7 1.4 x 10-3 <br /> MW-5 2� Slug (rising and falling head) See notes See notes <br /> MW-6 3� None N/A N/A <br /> ' Wireline Packer from 55-61 feet 2.3 x 10-6 6.5 x 10-3 <br /> MW-7 Wireline Packer from 251-271 feet 2.9 x 10-6 8.3 x 10-3 <br /> Wireline Packer from 261-271 feet 4.0 x 10-6 1.1 x 10-2 <br /> Notes: <br /> 1/MW-2 was estimated because water levels recovered to higher levels than"static"at the beginning of the <br /> test(Secor 1998). <br /> ' 2/Recovery too rapid and water displacements too small in slug tests conducted in monitoring well MW-5 for <br /> analysis. <br /> 3/Recovery too slow to conduct meaningful slug test in MW-6;depth to water exceeded commonly available <br /> ' pressure transducer cable lengths. <br /> N/A: Not Available. <br /> ' 4; > GOLDER 1 <br />